Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
author's%3a%22Gilliland-swetland%2c A.%22 2
author's%3a%22Gilliland-scotland%2c A.%22 2
authors%3a%22Gilliland-swetland%2c A.%22 2
author's%3a%22Gilliland-seland%2c A.%22 2
authors%3a%22Gilliland-scotland%2c A.%22 2

Caudle, D.M.: Cataloging videotapes (1995) 0.03

0.032337323 = product of:
  0.064674646 = sum of:
    0.064674646 = sum of:
      0.00859806 = weight(_text_:a in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.00859806 = score(doc=2635,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041389145 = queryNorm
          0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
      0.056076583 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056076583 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14493774 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041389145 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract: Describes the process of cataloguing a videotape on OCLC. Considers decisions to make before cataloguing, such as the level of detail required. Describes the OCLC MARC audiovisual format and explains rules for titles and notes
Date: 27.11.1995 17:07:22
Type: a

Libby, K.A.; Caudle, D.M.: ¬A survey of the outsourcing of cataloging in academic libraries (1997) 0.00
```
0.0023790773 = product of:
  0.0047581545 = sum of:
    0.0047581545 = product of:
      0.009516309 = sum of:
        0.009516309 = weight(_text_:a in 1090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009516309 = score(doc=1090,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041389145 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1090, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1090)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Reports results of a questionnaire survey of 187 US academic libraries to determine the degree to which they employed outsourcing of their cataloguing, the extent of these projects and their overall success. The survey instrument included questions about what factors influence the decision to outsource, what reasons libraries had for outsourcing or not outsourcing, what was being outsourced, and how vendors were chosen. Libraries also were asked to evaluate the success of outsourcing projects. Results show that outsourcing of cataloguing is not a strong trend in academic libraries but that libraries which outsourced were generally pleased with results. There also seems to be a correlation between size of collection and number of new titles catalogued anually, and the decision to outsource

Type

a