Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Chambers, S."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.01 
    0.012333257 = product of:
  0.024666514 = sum of:
    0.024666514 = product of:
      0.04933303 = sum of:
        0.04933303 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04933303 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Myall, C.; Chambers, S.: Copy cataloging for print and video monographs in two academic libraries : a case study of editing required for accuracy and completeness (2007) 0.01 
    0.0074650636 = product of:
  0.014930127 = sum of:
    0.014930127 = product of:
      0.05972051 = sum of:
        0.05972051 = weight(_text_:authors in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05972051 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article presents the results of a case study of editing required on OCLC bibliographic records for print monographs and video/DVD monographs during a three-month test at two mid-sized academic libraries. First, the authors reviewed the literature of cataloging/catalog quality and consider the problems this literature presents in terms of creating meaningful and measurable standards of "quality." Next, they define "quality" for the purposes of the case study and describe case-study procedures for determining and comparing extent of editing required for records to meet comparable standards. They then present results indicating that records for print monographs acquired at the two institutions usually required little or no editing (many of these records were U.S. national-level records), while records for video/DVD monographs required considerably more editing (U.S. nationallevel records for this category of acquisition were not available). Finally, the article proposes establishment of a cooperative program to create U.S. nationallevel bibliographic records for videorecordings/DVDs as a means of reducing redundant institution-level editing and ensuring availability of comparable records across formats.

Years

Types