Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Chan, L.M."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Chan, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Feasibility of a computer-generated subject validation file based on frequency of occurrence of assigned LC Subject Headings (1995) 0.01 
    0.010669115 = product of:
  0.032007344 = sum of:
    0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 6816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032007344 = score(doc=6816,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04990557 = queryNorm
        0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 6816, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6816)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  2. Chan, L.M.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification System in an online environment (1990) 0.01 
    0.010058938 = product of:
  0.030176813 = sum of:
    0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030176813 = score(doc=477,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04990557 = queryNorm
        0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Advantages and disadvantages of on-line classification access are presented with special attention to Library of Congress Classification (LCC) features for subject browsing, known item-searching, enhancement of keyword and controlled vocabulary searching, and other unique retrieval capabilities.
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium on Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment, held at the School of Library and Information Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
  3. Chan, L.M.: Functions of a subject authority file (1991) 0.01 
    0.008890929 = product of:
  0.026672786 = sum of:
    0.026672786 = weight(_text_:on in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026672786 = score(doc=2456,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04990557 = queryNorm
        0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Series
    ALCTS papers on library technical services and collections; no.1
  4. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Classification : alternative provisions (1995) 0.01 
    0.0075442037 = product of:
  0.02263261 = sum of:
    0.02263261 = weight(_text_:on in 5541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02263261 = score(doc=5541,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04990557 = queryNorm
        0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 5541, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5541)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Classification (LCC), being a system originally and specifically designed for the Library's own collection, generally eschews alternatives. Within the LCC schedules, alternatives are found occasionally in earlier editions; there are no alternative numbers in recently developed or revised schedules. On the other hand, many alternative numbers representing different treatment of specific types of materials such as bibliographies and monographic series are provided in LC MARC records. Such numbers may be used by other libraries that prefer the alternative treatment. In addition, many LC MARC records also include class or call numbers based on other classification schemes, including the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), the National Library of Medicine Classification (NLM), and the Superintendent of Documents Classification. The alternative class numbers assigned from other classification systems are provided as services to libraries not using the Library of Congress Classification.
  5. Chan, L.M.: Subject access systems in the USA (1995) 0.01 
    0.007112743 = product of:
  0.021338228 = sum of:
    0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021338228 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04990557 = queryNorm
        0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al

Themes