Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Chan, L.M."
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Chan, L.M.: Immroth's guide to the Library of Congress Classification (1980) 0.01
    0.0060107526 = product of:
      0.02404301 = sum of:
        0.02404301 = weight(_text_:to in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02404301 = score(doc=4307,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  2. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress class numbers in online catalog searching (1989) 0.00
    0.0048574214 = product of:
      0.019429686 = sum of:
        0.019429686 = weight(_text_:to in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019429686 = score(doc=1146,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In addition to using title keywords and subject headings for searching in the online catalog, the searcher may also use class numbers as access points. Library of Congress class or call numbers are particular effective in certain kinds of specific-item subject searching and serve as supplements to keywords and descriptors, improving precision and recall. Class number searching in the database can produce unique results because these numbers collect citations in ways that differ from those of keywords and descriptors
  3. Chan, L.M.: Inter-indexer consistency in subject cataloging (1989) 0.00
    0.0048574214 = product of:
      0.019429686 = sum of:
        0.019429686 = weight(_text_:to in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019429686 = score(doc=2276,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of the current study has been twofold: (1) to develop a valid methodology for studying indexing consistency in MARC records and, (2) to study such consistency in subject cataloging practice between non-LC libraries and the Library of Congress
  4. Chan, L.M.: ¬A subject cataloging code? (1989) 0.00
    0.0048574214 = product of:
      0.019429686 = sum of:
        0.019429686 = weight(_text_:to in 2870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019429686 = score(doc=2870,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 2870, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2870)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to a subject control in on-line catalogues. Examines whether a subject cataloguing code is, at this point in time, necessary or economically feasible, as well as questioning who will develop such a code and if experiences with AACR2 should make librarians fearful or hopeful about similar work with subject headings.