Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Chan, L.M."
  1. Chan, L.M.; Lin, X.; Zeng, M.: Structural and multilingual approaches to subject access on the Web (1999) 0.02
    0.020225711 = product of:
      0.12135427 = sum of:
        0.045669187 = weight(_text_:web in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045669187 = score(doc=162,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.111951075 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
        0.075685084 = weight(_text_:suche in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075685084 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138755 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.441602 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Zu den großen Herausforderungen einer sinnvollen Suche im WWW gehören die riesige Menge des Verfügbaren und die Sparchbarrieren. Verfahren, die die Web-Ressourcen im Hinblick auf ein effizienteres Retrieval inhaltlich strukturieren, werden daher ebenso dringend benötigt wie Programme, die mit der Sprachvielfalt umgehen können. Im folgenden Vortrag werden wir einige Ansätze diskutieren, die zur Bewältigung der beiden Probleme derzeit unternommen werden
  2. Yi, K.; Chan, L.M.: Linking folksonomy to Library of Congress subject headings : an exploratory study (2009) 0.01
    0.013578918 = product of:
      0.05431567 = sum of:
        0.016146496 = weight(_text_:web in 3616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016146496 = score(doc=3616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.111951075 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 3616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3616)
        0.008092071 = weight(_text_:information in 3616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008092071 = score(doc=3616,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 3616, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3616)
        0.030077105 = weight(_text_:system in 3616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030077105 = score(doc=3616,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 3616, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3616)
      0.25 = coord(3/12)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the linking of a folksonomy (user vocabulary) and LCSH (controlled vocabulary) on the basis of word matching, for the potential use of LCSH in bringing order to folksonomies. Design/methodology/approach - A selected sample of a folksonomy from a popular collaborative tagging system, Delicious, was word-matched with LCSH. LCSH was transformed into a tree structure called an LCSH tree for the matching. A close examination was conducted on the characteristics of folksonomies, the overlap of folksonomies with LCSH, and the distribution of folksonomies over the LCSH tree. Findings - The experimental results showed that the total proportion of tags being matched with LC subject headings constituted approximately two-thirds of all tags involved, with an additional 10 percent of the remaining tags having potential matches. A number of barriers for the linking as well as two areas in need of improving the matching are identified and described. Three important tag distribution patterns over the LCSH tree were identified and supported: skewedness, multifacet, and Zipfian-pattern. Research limitations/implications - The results of the study can be adopted for the development of innovative methods of mapping between folksonomy and LCSH, which directly contributes to effective access and retrieval of tagged web resources and to the integration of multiple information repositories based on the two vocabularies. Practical implications - The linking of controlled vocabularies can be applicable to enhance information retrieval capability within collaborative tagging systems as well as across various tagging system information depositories and bibliographic databases. Originality/value - This is among frontier works that examines the potential of linking a folksonomy, extracted from a collaborative tagging system, to an authority-maintained subject heading system. It provides exploratory data to support further advanced mapping methods for linking the two vocabularies.
  3. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.01
    0.013213158 = product of:
      0.05285263 = sum of:
        0.0070079383 = weight(_text_:information in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070079383 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.031901587 = weight(_text_:system in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031901587 = score(doc=5920,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.013943106 = product of:
          0.027886212 = sum of:
            0.027886212 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027886212 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120126344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03430388 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(3/12)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  4. Chan, L.M.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification System in an online environment (1990) 0.01
    0.0072152335 = product of:
      0.0432914 = sum of:
        0.013214295 = weight(_text_:information in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013214295 = score(doc=477,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
        0.030077105 = weight(_text_:system in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030077105 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium on Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment, held at the School of Library and Information Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
  5. Chan, L.M.: Dewey Decimal Classification : Edition 21 and international perspectives. Opening remarks (1997) 0.01
    0.0057826564 = product of:
      0.03469594 = sum of:
        0.012138106 = weight(_text_:information in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012138106 = score(doc=25,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
        0.02255783 = weight(_text_:system in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02255783 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    In respect to the nature and quantity of available information, 1876 was a very different world from the one we know in the 1990s. Yet in spite of over a century of changes, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), the system that helped organize a small college library, has grown to one that is helping the whole world organize its vast store of information resources. In this closing session, I would like to summarize some of the major factors that have contributed so far to the Dewey system's success as an information organization tool. I will also discuss ongoing efforts to ensure its viability in the future
  6. Yi, K.; Chan, L.M.: Revisiting the syntactical and structural analysis of Library of Congress Subject Headings for the digital environment (2010) 0.01
    0.005411425 = product of:
      0.03246855 = sum of:
        0.009910721 = weight(_text_:information in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009910721 = score(doc=3431,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
        0.02255783 = weight(_text_:system in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02255783 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    With the current information environment characterized by the proliferation of digital resources, including collaboratively created and shared resources, Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) is facing the challenges of effective and efficient subject-based organization and retrieval of digital resources. To explore the feasibility of utilizing LCSH in a digital environment, we might need to revisit its basic characteristics. The objectives of our study were to analyze LCSH in both syntactic and relational structures, to discover the structural characteristics of LCSH, and to identify problems and issues for the feasibility of LCSH as an effective subject access tool. This study reports and discusses issues raised by the syntactic and hierarchical structures of LCSH that present challenges to its use in a networked environment. Given the results of this study, we recommend a number of provisional future directions for the development of LCSH towards further becoming a viable system for digital and networked resources.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.4, S.677-687
  7. O'Neill, E.T.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; Kammerer, K.; Vizine-Goetz, D.; Chan, L.M.; El-Hoshy, L.: FAST: faceted application of subject terminology (2003) 0.00
    0.004337178 = product of:
      0.026023068 = sum of:
        0.02018312 = weight(_text_:web in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018312 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.111951075 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
        0.0058399485 = weight(_text_:information in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058399485 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is by far the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains upward compatibility with LCSH, and any valid set of LC subject headings can be converted to FAST headings.
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  8. Chan, L.M.; Lin, X.; Zeng, M.L.: Structural and multilingual approaches to subject access on the Web (2000) 0.00
    0.004036624 = product of:
      0.048439488 = sum of:
        0.048439488 = weight(_text_:web in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048439488 = score(doc=507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.111951075 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
  9. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.L.: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) (2009) 0.00
    0.0034918408 = product of:
      0.020951044 = sum of:
        0.0070079383 = weight(_text_:information in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070079383 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
        0.013943106 = product of:
          0.027886212 = sum of:
            0.027886212 = weight(_text_:22 in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027886212 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120126344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03430388 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:42
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  10. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (2005) 0.00
    0.003133032 = product of:
      0.037596382 = sum of:
        0.037596382 = weight(_text_:system in 4598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037596382 = score(doc=4598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 4598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4598)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    The only comprehensive treatise an the Library of Congress Subject Headings system, now fully updated to address LCSH in the electronic environment.
  11. Chan, L.M.; Mitchell, J.S.: Dewey Decimal Classification : principles and applications (2003) 0.00
    0.0027111596 = product of:
      0.032533914 = sum of:
        0.032533914 = product of:
          0.06506783 = sum of:
            0.06506783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06506783 = score(doc=3247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120126344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03430388 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3247)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Object
    DDC-22
  12. Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; O'Neill, E.T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: ¬A faceted approach to subject data in the Dublin Core metadata record (2001) 0.00
    0.0023546976 = product of:
      0.02825637 = sum of:
        0.02825637 = weight(_text_:web in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02825637 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.111951075 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes FAST, the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology, a project at OCLC to make Library of Congress Subject Headings easier to use in Dublin Core metadata by breaking out facets of space, time, and form. Work on FAST can be watched at its web site, http://www.miskatonic.org/library/, which has recent presentations and reports. It is interesting to see facets and Dublin Core combined, though both LCSH and FAST subject headings are beyond what most people making a small faceted classification would want or need.
  13. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (1995) 0.00
    0.002323851 = product of:
      0.027886212 = sum of:
        0.027886212 = product of:
          0.055772424 = sum of:
            0.055772424 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055772424 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120126344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03430388 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:37:22
  14. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Classification : alternative provisions (1995) 0.00
    0.0018798192 = product of:
      0.02255783 = sum of:
        0.02255783 = weight(_text_:system in 5541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02255783 = score(doc=5541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 5541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5541)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Classification (LCC), being a system originally and specifically designed for the Library's own collection, generally eschews alternatives. Within the LCC schedules, alternatives are found occasionally in earlier editions; there are no alternative numbers in recently developed or revised schedules. On the other hand, many alternative numbers representing different treatment of specific types of materials such as bibliographies and monographic series are provided in LC MARC records. Such numbers may be used by other libraries that prefer the alternative treatment. In addition, many LC MARC records also include class or call numbers based on other classification schemes, including the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), the National Library of Medicine Classification (NLM), and the Superintendent of Documents Classification. The alternative class numbers assigned from other classification systems are provided as services to libraries not using the Library of Congress Classification.
  15. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Classification as an online retrieval tool : potentials and limitations (1986) 0.00
    0.0013626547 = product of:
      0.016351856 = sum of:
        0.016351856 = weight(_text_:information in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016351856 = score(doc=1145,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 5(1986), S.181-192
  16. Chan, L.M.: Classification present and future (1995) 0.00
    0.0013626547 = product of:
      0.016351856 = sum of:
        0.016351856 = weight(_text_:information in 5560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016351856 = score(doc=5560,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5560, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5560)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    Suggests that recent developments in the way information is generated, packaged amd accessed have broadened and changed the nature and application of classification in library and information networks. Examines the role of classification by posing the following questions: what, how and why do we classify? Within this context the expanding role of classification is examined with regard to how classification affects accessing, browsing, identifying, navigating, mapping and evaluating information and how it is and may be used in collection and database management, controlled vocabulary construction and development, and research
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 36th Allerton Institute, 23-25 Oct 94, Allerton Park, Monticello, IL: "New Roles for Classification in Libraries and Information Networks: Presentation and Reports"
  17. O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001) 0.00
    0.0011619255 = product of:
      0.013943106 = sum of:
        0.013943106 = product of:
          0.027886212 = sum of:
            0.027886212 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027886212 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120126344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03430388 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Hodges, T.L.; Chan, L.M.: Subject cataloging principles and systems (2009) 0.00
    9.635424E-4 = product of:
      0.0115625085 = sum of:
        0.0115625085 = weight(_text_:information in 4698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0115625085 = score(doc=4698,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4698, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4698)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    After an introduction that addresses the means people use to search for information, this entry articulates the principles underlying various subject access options, including both controlled vocabulary systems and classification. It begins with a brief history of subject access provisions, including an account of the impact of automation, and goes on to discuss in some detail the principles underlying American library practice in respect to subject access. It then, briefly, describes selected subject-access schemes (including both subject heading lists and classification systems) in terms of how they reflect the principles presented, and how well they fulfill their stated functions.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  19. Chan, L.M.: Subject analysis tools online : the challenge ahead (1990) 0.00
    7.786599E-4 = product of:
      0.009343918 = sum of:
        0.009343918 = weight(_text_:information in 2165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009343918 = score(doc=2165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2165)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 9(1990), S.259-262
  20. Chan, L.M.: Inter-indexer consistency in subject cataloging (1989) 0.00
    7.786599E-4 = product of:
      0.009343918 = sum of:
        0.009343918 = weight(_text_:information in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009343918 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 8(1989), S.349-358