McKercher, B.; Chang, P.X.: ¬A comparison of USMARC and UNIMARC for system design (1995)
0.01
0.0069733984 = product of:
0.020920195 = sum of:
0.020920195 = product of:
0.04184039 = sum of:
0.04184039 = weight(_text_:management in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04184039 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Provides a background to the development of the MINISIS relational database management system. The new MINISIS will offer a forms-based 4GL application development environment for building an integrated library system at the heart of which will be the catalogue database. Describes the research on the the database structure involving a comparison between USMARC and UNIMARC. Covers the worldwide use of the 2 systems. Discusses differences in field/subfield content designation; differences in field attributes; access points; linking entries, related fields; control information numbers and codes; USMARC format integration and linkage to other languages and holdings information; linkage with other MARC files; and considerations regarding systems design
