Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Chang, R."
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Chang, R.; Raatjes, R.: Understanding MARC : another look (1990) 0.01
    0.012392559 = product of:
      0.04543938 = sum of:
        0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 3542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062481174 = score(doc=3542,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3542, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3542)
        0.036413636 = weight(_text_:r in 3542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036413636 = score(doc=3542,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.4137823 = fieldWeight in 3542, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3542)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 3542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=3542,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3542, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3542)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    MARC (Machine Readable Cataloguing) format has been widely used and discussed in the library profession. However, there appear to have a wide spread misunderstanding of its real structure and attributes. Discusses the need for use to understand it a little more. Presents the general misconceptions about MARC, the structure of MARC format. In this library automation age, MARC is a key element in library services, and it deserves another look.
    Source
    Journal of educational media and library sciences. 27(1990) no.2, S.139-154
    Type
    a