Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Chen, C."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Chen, C.: Mapping scientific frontiers : the quest for knowledge visualization (2003) 0.01
    0.012560214 = product of:
      0.025120428 = sum of:
        0.025120428 = product of:
          0.12560214 = sum of:
            0.12560214 = weight(_text_:author's in 2213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12560214 = score(doc=2213,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2990459 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04449986 = queryNorm
                0.42000958 = fieldWeight in 2213, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2213)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 55(2004) no.4, S.363-365 (J.W. Schneider): "Theories and methods for mapping scientific frontiers have existed for decades-especially within quantitative studies of science. This book investigates mapping scientific frontiers from the perspective of visual thinking and visual exploration (visual communication). The central theme is construction of visual-spatial representations that may convey insights into the dynamic structure of scientific frontiers. The author's previous book, Information Visualisation and Virtual Environments (1999), also concerns some of the ideas behind and possible benefits of visual communication. This new book takes a special focus an knowledge visualization, particularly in relation to science literature. The book is not a technical tutorial as the focus is an principles of visual communication and ways that may reveal the dynamics of scientific frontiers. The new approach to science mapping presented is the culmination of different approaches from several disciplines, such as philosophy of science, information retrieval, scientometrics, domain analysis, and information visualization. The book therefore addresses an audience with different disciplinary backgrounds and tries to stimulate interdisciplinary research. Chapter 1, The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, introduces a range of examples that illustrate fundamental issues concerning visual communication in general and science mapping in particular. Chapter 2, Mapping the Universe, focuses an the basic principles of cartography for visual communication. Chapter 3, Mapping the Mind, turns the attention inward and explores the design of mind maps, maps that represent our thoughts, experience, and knowledge. Chapter 4, Enabling Techniques for Science Mapping, essentially outlines the author's basic approach to science mapping.
  2. Leydesdorff, L.; Rafols, I.; Chen, C.: Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citations (2013) 0.01
    0.008742885 = product of:
      0.01748577 = sum of:
        0.01748577 = product of:
          0.03497154 = sum of:
            0.03497154 = weight(_text_:i in 1131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03497154 = score(doc=1131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16784143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04449986 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 1131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Ping, Q.; He, J.; Chen, C.: How many ways to use CiteSpace? : a study of user interactive events over 14 months (2017) 0.01
    0.008742885 = product of:
      0.01748577 = sum of:
        0.01748577 = product of:
          0.03497154 = sum of:
            0.03497154 = weight(_text_:i in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03497154 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16784143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04449986 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Using visual analytic systems effectively may incur a steep learning curve for users, especially for those who have little prior knowledge of either using the tool or accomplishing analytic tasks. How do users deal with a steep learning curve over time? Are there particularly problematic aspects of an analytic process? In this article we investigate these questions through an integrative study of the use of CiteSpace-a visual analytic tool for finding trends and patterns in scientific literature. In particular, we analyze millions of interactive events in logs generated by users worldwide over a 14-month period. The key findings are: (i) three levels of proficiency are identified, namely, level 1: low proficiency, level 2: intermediate proficiency, and level 3: high proficiency, and (ii) behavioral patterns at level 3 are resulted from a more engaging interaction with the system, involving a wider variety of events and being characterized by longer state transition paths, whereas behavioral patterns at levels 1 and 2 seem to focus on learning how to use the tool. This study contributes to the development and evaluation of visual analytic systems in realistic settings and provides a valuable addition to the study of interactive visual analytic processes.
  4. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.01
    0.0075363955 = product of:
      0.015072791 = sum of:
        0.015072791 = product of:
          0.030145582 = sum of:
            0.030145582 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030145582 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15583092 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04449986 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
  5. Liu, S.; Chen, C.: ¬The differences between latent topics in abstracts and citation contexts of citing papers (2013) 0.01
    0.0075363955 = product of:
      0.015072791 = sum of:
        0.015072791 = product of:
          0.030145582 = sum of:
            0.030145582 = weight(_text_:22 in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030145582 = score(doc=671,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15583092 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04449986 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:50:00