Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Chen, H.-H."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Huang, H.-H.; Wang, J.-J.; Chen, H.-H.: Implicit opinion analysis : extraction and polarity labelling (2017) 0.01
    0.009052756 = product of:
      0.036211025 = sum of:
        0.036211025 = weight(_text_:data in 3820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036211025 = score(doc=3820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 3820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3820)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Opinion words are crucial information for sentiment analysis. In some text, however, opinion words are absent or highly ambiguous. The resulting implicit opinions are more difficult to extract and label than explicit ones. In this paper, cutting-edge machine-learning approaches - deep neural network and word-embedding - are adopted for implicit opinion mining at the snippet and clause levels. Hotel reviews written in Chinese are collected and annotated as the experimental data set. Results show the convolutional neural network models not only outperform traditional support vector machine models, but also capture hidden knowledge within the raw text. The strength of word-embedding is also analyzed.
  2. Lee, L.-H.; Juan, Y.-C.; Tseng, W.-L.; Chen, H.-H.; Tseng, Y.-H.: Mining browsing behaviors for objectionable content filtering (2015) 0.01
    0.006466255 = product of:
      0.02586502 = sum of:
        0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 1818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02586502 = score(doc=1818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 1818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1818)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores users' browsing intents to predict the category of a user's next access during web surfing and applies the results to filter objectionable content, such as pornography, gambling, violence, and drugs. Users' access trails in terms of category sequences in click-through data are employed to mine users' web browsing behaviors. Contextual relationships of URL categories are learned by the hidden Markov model. The top-level domains (TLDs) extracted from URLs themselves and the corresponding categories are caught by the TLD model. Given a URL to be predicted, its TLD and current context are empirically combined in an aggregation model. In addition to the uses of the current context, the predictions of the URL accessed previously in different contexts by various users are also considered by majority rule to improve the aggregation model. Large-scale experiments show that the advanced aggregation approach achieves promising performance while maintaining an acceptably low false positive rate. Different strategies are introduced to integrate the model with the blacklist it generates for filtering objectionable web pages without analyzing their content. In practice, this is complementary to the existing content analysis from users' behavioral perspectives.
  3. Tsai, M.-.F.; Chen, H.-H.; Wang, Y.-T.: Learning a merge model for multilingual information retrieval (2011) 0.01
    0.005299047 = product of:
      0.021196188 = sum of:
        0.021196188 = product of:
          0.042392377 = sum of:
            0.042392377 = weight(_text_:processing in 2750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042392377 = score(doc=2750,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 2750, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2750)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 47(2011) no.5, S.635-646