Liu, X.; Chen, X.: Authors' noninstitutional emails and their correlation with retraction (2021)
0.05
0.05350879 = sum of:
0.048670426 = product of:
0.1946817 = sum of:
0.1946817 = weight(_text_:authors in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1946817 = score(doc=152,freq=8.0), product of:
0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0048383637 = product of:
0.0096767275 = sum of:
0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0096767275 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We collected research articles from Retraction Watch database, Scopus, and a major retraction announcement by Springer, to identify emails used by authors. Authors' emails can be institutional emails and noninstitutional emails. Data suggest that retracted articles are more likely to use noninstitutional emails, but it is difficult to generalize. The study put some focus on authors from China.
- Language
- e
