Yan, E.; Chen, Z.; Li, K.: Authors' status and the perceived quality of their work : measuring citation sentiment change in nobel articles (2020)
0.00
0.0026309472 = product of:
0.015785683 = sum of:
0.015785683 = weight(_text_:in in 5670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015785683 = score(doc=5670,freq=16.0), product of:
0.061893053 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.045501083 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 5670, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5670)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Prior research in status ordering has used numeric indicators to examine the impact of a status change on the perception of a scientist's work. This study measures the perception change directly as reflected in citation sentiment, with the attainment of a Nobel Prize in Chemistry or a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine considered the status change. The article identifies 12,393 citances to 25 Nobel articles in PubMed Central and includes a control article set of 75 articles with 30,851 citances. The results show a moderate increase in citation sentiment toward Nobel articles postaward. Dynamically, for Nobel articles there is a steady sentiment increase, and a Nobel Prize seems to co-occur with this trend. This trend, however, is not evident in the control article set.