Yan, E.; Chen, Z.; Li, K.: Authors' status and the perceived quality of their work : measuring citation sentiment change in nobel articles (2020)
0.00
0.0028993662 = product of:
0.008698098 = sum of:
0.008698098 = product of:
0.017396197 = sum of:
0.017396197 = weight(_text_:of in 5670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017396197 = score(doc=5670,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 5670, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5670)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Prior research in status ordering has used numeric indicators to examine the impact of a status change on the perception of a scientist's work. This study measures the perception change directly as reflected in citation sentiment, with the attainment of a Nobel Prize in Chemistry or a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine considered the status change. The article identifies 12,393 citances to 25 Nobel articles in PubMed Central and includes a control article set of 75 articles with 30,851 citances. The results show a moderate increase in citation sentiment toward Nobel articles postaward. Dynamically, for Nobel articles there is a steady sentiment increase, and a Nobel Prize seems to co-occur with this trend. This trend, however, is not evident in the control article set.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.3, S.314-324
