Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Christensen, A."
  1. Christensen, A.: Next generation catalogues : what do users think? (2013) 0.02
    0.022021351 = product of:
      0.06606405 = sum of:
        0.06606405 = weight(_text_:wide in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06606405 = score(doc=1476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22492146 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050763648 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In the wake of the digital revolution, libraries have started rethinking their catalogues and reshaping them along the lines that have been set by popular search engines and online retailers. Yet it has also become a hallmark of next­ generation catalogues to reflect the results of studies concerning user behaviour and user needs and to rely on the participation of users in the development and testing of the new tools. A wide array of methods for user­ driven design and development are being employed, which ideally leverage discovery platforms that reflect the specifics of library metadata and materials as well as the need for attractive design and useful new functionalities. After looking back at the history of user studies on online catalogues, we will briefly investigate methods to involve users actively in the design and development processes for new catalogues before describing and examining the outcomes of studies of users' perceptions.
  2. Christensen, A.: Auskunft 2.0 : Vom Wie und Wo der bibliothekarischen Antwort im Web 2.0 (2007) 0.01
    0.007964648 = product of:
      0.023893945 = sum of:
        0.023893945 = product of:
          0.04778789 = sum of:
            0.04778789 = weight(_text_:web in 4592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04778789 = score(doc=4592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 4592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4592)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Christensen, A.: Wissenschaftliche Literatur entdecken : was bibliothekarische Discovery-Systeme von der Konkurrenz lernen und was sie ihr zeigen können (2022) 0.01
    0.0069690677 = product of:
      0.020907203 = sum of:
        0.020907203 = product of:
          0.041814405 = sum of:
            0.041814405 = weight(_text_:web in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041814405 = score(doc=833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In den letzten Jahren ist das Angebot an Academic Search Engines für die Recherche nach Fachliteratur zu allen Wissenschaftsgebieten stark angewachsen und ergänzt die beliebten kommerziellen Angebote wie Web of Science oder Scopus. Der Artikel zeigt die wesentlichen Unterschiede zwischen bibliothekarischen Discovery-Systemen und Academic Search Engines wie Base, Dimensions oder Open Alex auf und diskutiert Möglichkeiten, wie beide von einander profitieren können. Diese Entwicklungsperspektiven betreffen Aspekte wie die Kontextualisierung von Wissen, die Datenmodellierung, die automatischen Datenanreicherung sowie den Zuschnitt von Suchräumen.