Owens, L.A.; Cochrane, P.A.: Thesaurus evaluation (2004)
0.01
0.0091349725 = product of:
0.027404916 = sum of:
0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 4856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010820055 = score(doc=4856,freq=6.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 4856, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4856)
0.01658486 = weight(_text_:und in 4856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01658486 = score(doc=4856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4856)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The process of thesaurus evaluation can enhance the value of a thesaurus in terms of usability, scope, precision and recall. Structural, formative, observational and comparative evaluation techniques are explained along with specific examples of their use. These methods of evaluation can be applied in the assessment of an existing thesaurus or the construction of a new thesaurus. The history of thesauri since 1960, the development of national and international standards, and sources of evaluative literature are also discussed.
- Footnote
- Auch in: The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision. Ed. by S.K. Roe u. A.R. Thomas. Binghamton: Haworth 2004.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
