Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0035395343 = product of:
  0.010618603 = sum of:
    0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 6586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010618603 = score(doc=6586,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6586, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6586)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Type

a

0.0031904932 = product of:
  0.00957148 = sum of:
    0.00957148 = weight(_text_:a in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00957148 = score(doc=4431,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.18373153 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The recent explosion of the Internet and the WWW has made digital libraries popular. Easy access to a digital library is provided by commercially available Web browsers, which provide a user-friendly interface. To retrieve documents of interest, the user is provided with a search interface that may only consist of one input field and one push button. Most users type in a single keyword, click the button, and hope for the best. The result of a query using this kind of search interface can consist of a large unordered set of documents, or a ranked list of documents based on the freuqency of the keywords. Both lists can contain articles unrelated to the user's inquiry unless a sophisticated search was performed and the user knows exactly what to look for. More sophisticated algorithms for ranking the search results according to how well they meet the users needs as expressed in the search input may help. However, what is desperately needed are software tools that can analyze the search result and manipulate large hierarchies of data graphically. In this article we describe the design of a language-independent document classification systems being developed to help users of the Florida Center for Library Automation analyze search query results. Easy access through the Web is provided, as well as a graphical user interface to display the classification results. We also describe the use of this system to retrieve and analyze sets of documents from public Web sites

Content

"We use the term 'classification' to denote the general process of identifying the subject matter of a document. We use the term 'clustering' to refer to the process of forming groups (clusters) of documents with related topics and subtopics, and visualizing those clusters"

Type

a

0.003065327 = product of:
  0.009195981 = sum of:
    0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 7428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009195981 = score(doc=7428,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 7428, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7428)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This paper looks at the issues underlying the reference question as they are affected by structuralist and post structuralist criticism. it is suggested that rather than being encased in a static paradigm the reference question is a dynamic interplay between the structures of the 'languages' which constitute the question. The forms that are the specific and overt manifestations of the undelying structures can lead to superficial and misleading readings of the question

Type

a

0.0022989952 = product of:
  0.006896985 = sum of:
    0.006896985 = weight(_text_:a in 1644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006896985 = score(doc=1644,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1644, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1644)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Decision making for the complex patient is challenging for doctors because of increased complexity, such as multiple co-morbidities and interprofessionality for which evidence-based literature and guidelines are currently lacking. The consequent uncertainty causes vagueness, threatening patient safety and the quality of care. This article is motivated by the design science paradigm and describes the interprofessional decision-making model for the complex patient, namely, INDECO along with an example instantiation. Drawing on our experience in an intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Israel, the bi-dimensional view of this model includes the medical- and the interprofessional perspective. Retrospective assessment of 3 case studies of complex patients is used for assessing the usefulness of INDECO in decision making. The study reported here draws support from relevant literature, including the information science, information systems, and the medical domains. The findings resonate with emerging research developments focusing on healthcare decision making.

Type

a

7.742731E-4 = product of:
  0.0023228193 = sum of:
    0.0023228193 = weight(_text_:a in 3338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0023228193 = score(doc=3338,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 3338, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3338)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Pressestimmen - In diesem faszinierenden Buch machen Eric Schmidt und Jared Cohen von ihrer einzigartigen Sachkenntnis Gebrauch, um uns eine Zukunft auszumalen, in der die Einkommen steigen, die Partizipation zunimmt und ein echter Sinn für Gemeinschaft entsteht - vorausgesetzt, wir treffen heute die richtigen Entscheidungen. (Bill Clinton) - Dieses Buch erklärt sowohl, was die neue Welt ausmacht, die das Internet schafft, als auch die Herausforderungen, die sie mit sich bringt. Niemand könnte das besser als Eric Schmidt und Jared Cohen. (Tony Blair) - Selbst wer nicht alle Schlussfolgerungen teilen mag, wird viel von diesem anregenden Buch lernen. (Henry A. Kissinger) - Auf dieses Buch habe ich gewartet: Eine prägnante und überzeugende Darstellung der Auswirkungen, die Technologie auf Krieg und Frieden, Freiheit und Diplomatie hat ... - Eine unverzichtbare Lektüre. (Madeleine Albright) -Dies ist das wichtigste - und faszinierendste - Buch, das bislang über die Auswirkungen des Digitalzeitalters auf unsere Welt geschrieben wurde. (Walter Isaacson) - «Die Vernetzung der Welt» verbindet auf faszinierende Weise Konzepte und Einblicke darüber, wie die sich die virtuelle Welt und die internationale Staatenordnung durchkreuzen. (Robert B. Zoellick) - Kaum jemand auf der Welt beschäftigt sich mehr damit, sich das neue Digitalzeitalter auszumalen - und es zu gestalten - als Eric Schmidt und Jared Cohen. Mit diesem Buch werfen sie einen Blick in ihre Kristallkugel und laden uns ein, ihnen dabei über die Schulter zu schauen. (Michael Bloomberg) - Dieses Buch ist die aufschlussreichste Erkundung unserer Zukunft, die ich je gelesen habe. Ich konnte es gar nicht mehr weglegen. (Sir Richard Branson) - «Die Vernetzung der Welt» ist Pflichtlektüre für alle, die das Ausmaß der digitalen Revolution wirklich verstehen wollen. (General Michael Hayden - ehemaliger Direktor der CIA) - Trotz der Herkunft der Autoren verbreitet «Die Vernetzung der Welt» keine Silicon-Valley-Propaganda ... Und was noch wichtiger ist: Es hebt die Debatte über Technologie auf ein höheres Niveau - weg vom banalen Streit über den Nutzen von Dating-Apps, hin zu allgemeineren Frage nach der gegenseitigen Beeinflussung von Technologie und Macht. (The Economist) - Dieses Buch ist deutlich mehr als nur Science Fiction. Es diskutiert hellsichtig und offen die entscheidenden Fragen, denen wir uns schon jetzt stellen müssen. Wer die Welt der Zukunft verstehen will, sollte es daher unbedingt lesen. (NDR Kultur)