Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.10
0.10096708 = product of:
0.2827078 = sum of:
0.048010457 = weight(_text_:subject in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048010457 = score(doc=7242,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.071214594 = weight(_text_:classification in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071214594 = score(doc=7242,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7447551 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.07599616 = product of:
0.15199232 = sum of:
0.15199232 = weight(_text_:schemes in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15199232 = score(doc=7242,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16067243 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.9459764 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071214594 = weight(_text_:classification in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071214594 = score(doc=7242,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7447551 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.016272005 = product of:
0.03254401 = sum of:
0.03254401 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03254401 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a comparative study of 3 classification schemes: LCC, DDC and NLM Classification to determine their effectiveness in classifying materials on health insurance. Examined 2 hypotheses: that there would be no differences in the scatter of the 3 classification schemes; and that there would be overlap between all 3 schemes but no difference in the classes into which the subject was placed. There was subject scatter in all 3 classification schemes and litlle overlap between the 3 systems
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
- Object
- NLM Classification
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 23(1996) no.2, S.89-104
