Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 2
precises%3a%2f_documents %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 2
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a angle %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 2
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 deskriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 2
precises%3a%2f_documents %2f author %26 deskriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 2

Copeland, A.J.: Analysis of public library users' digital preservation practices (2011) 0.01

0.01333869 = product of:
  0.10670952 = sum of:
    0.07786095 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07786095 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.4331851 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
    0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028848568 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)

Abstract: This research investigated preservation practices of personal digital information by public library users. This qualitative study used semistructured interviews and two visual representation techniques, information source horizons and matrices, for data collection. The constant comparison method and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. A model emerged which describes the effects of social, cognitive, and affective influences on personal preservation decisions as well as the effects of fading cognitive associations and technological advances, combined with information escalation over time. Because the preservation of personal digital information involves personal, social, and technological interactions, the integration of these factors is necessary for a viable solution to the digital preservation problem.
Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1288-1300

Copeland, A.J.; Barreau, D.: Helping people to manage and share their digital information : a role for public libraries (2011) 0.00

8.152149E-4 = product of:
  0.013043438 = sum of:
    0.013043438 = product of:
      0.026086876 = sum of:
        0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026086876 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)

Date: 11.12.2019 17:47:22