Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Coyle, K."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Coyle, K.: Simplicity in data models (2015) 0.05 
    0.04572599 = product of:
  0.09145198 = sum of:
    0.09145198 = product of:
      0.18290396 = sum of:
        0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 2025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18290396 = score(doc=2025,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 2025, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2025)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Evolving from database models using punch cards, strict linear relational databases and predefined object-oriented data structures, the triple statements underlying Semantic Web technologies bypass many design constraints to offer endless flexibility. Overcoming structure is challenging, especially the relatively recent structure formalized in the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Though geared to easier access and interoperability and recognizing a multilevel bibliographic model, FRBR remains tied to translating entity-relation diagrams to data structures. Resource Description Framework (RDF) provides a more flexible way to express concepts, in which bibliographic models may be thought of as graphs of properties and relationships. But even RDF-based models can undermine that flexibility by mixing concept classes and data structures. The advantage of RDF classes is to provide semantics that enable a user to focus on similarities, not bound by contextual constraints.and success metrics.
  2. Coyle, K.: FRBR, before and after : a look at our bibliographic models (2016) 0.01 
    0.008324416 = product of:
  0.016648833 = sum of:
    0.016648833 = product of:
      0.033297665 = sum of:
        0.033297665 = weight(_text_:22 in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033297665 = score(doc=2786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 2.2016 16:22:58

Types

Classifications