Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 3
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeinen %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 3
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f firmen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 3
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesign %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 3
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesigns %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 3

Creider, L.S.: Family names and the cataloger (2007) 0.00

0.0019480734 = product of:
  0.019480733 = sum of:
    0.005827016 = weight(_text_:in in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005827016 = score(doc=2285,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
    0.013653717 = product of:
      0.027307434 = sum of:
        0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027307434 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1 = coord(2/20)

Abstract: The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Creider, L.S.: ¬A comparison of the Paris Principles and the International Cataloguing Principles (2009) 0.00

0.0017407619 = product of:
  0.017407618 = sum of:
    0.012698677 = weight(_text_:der in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012698677 = score(doc=2985,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
    0.00470894 = weight(_text_:in in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00470894 = score(doc=2985,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
  0.1 = coord(2/20)

Abstract: After more than forty-five years of cataloging experience with the Paris Principles and their impact on the international sharing of bibliographic data, the process of replacing them with a wider and deeper set of International Cataloguing Principles is nearing completion. This paper compares the scope, technological context, process of decision-making, conceptual framework, and amount of change involved in the adoption of the two different statements.
Theme: Geschichte der Kataloge

Creider, L.S.: Cataloging, reception, and the boundaries of a "work" (2006) 0.00
```
2.0601612E-4 = product of:
  0.0041203224 = sum of:
    0.0041203224 = weight(_text_:in in 5769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041203224 = score(doc=5769,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 5769, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5769)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
```
Abstract

The concept of a "work" is fundamental to cataloging and users, but there is no clear understanding of the point at which one work becomes another. Various factors influence the setting of the boundaries of a work including that of the reception of the work. Brief investigations of the transmission and study of works such as medieval saints' lives and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle as well as works conceived in electronic form give insight into the processes involved and provide some clues for how catalogers can cope with these factors.