-
Creider, L.S.: Family names and the cataloger (2007)
0.00
0.0012649212 = product of:
0.0139141325 = sum of:
0.004161952 = weight(_text_:in in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004161952 = score(doc=2285,freq=4.0), product of:
0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02056547 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
0.00975218 = product of:
0.01950436 = sum of:
0.01950436 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01950436 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02056547 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
- Abstract
- The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Creider, L.S.: Cataloging, reception, and the boundaries of a "work" (2006)
0.00
0.0011621498 = product of:
0.0127836475 = sum of:
0.009840704 = product of:
0.019681407 = sum of:
0.019681407 = weight(_text_:29 in 5769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019681407 = score(doc=5769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02056547 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5769)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0029429442 = weight(_text_:in in 5769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029429442 = score(doc=5769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02056547 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 5769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5769)
0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
- Abstract
- The concept of a "work" is fundamental to cataloging and users, but there is no clear understanding of the point at which one work becomes another. Various factors influence the setting of the boundaries of a work including that of the reception of the work. Brief investigations of the transmission and study of works such as medieval saints' lives and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle as well as works conceived in electronic form give insight into the processes involved and provide some clues for how catalogers can cope with these factors.
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 16:40:09
-
Creider, L.S.: ¬A comparison of the Paris Principles and the International Cataloguing Principles (2009)
0.00
1.5288024E-4 = product of:
0.003363365 = sum of:
0.003363365 = weight(_text_:in in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003363365 = score(doc=2985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02056547 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
0.045454547 = coord(1/22)
- Abstract
- After more than forty-five years of cataloging experience with the Paris Principles and their impact on the international sharing of bibliographic data, the process of replacing them with a wider and deeper set of International Cataloguing Principles is nearing completion. This paper compares the scope, technological context, process of decision-making, conceptual framework, and amount of change involved in the adoption of the two different statements.