Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)
-
Creider, L.S.: Family names and the cataloger (2007)
0.08
0.07933721 = sum of: 0.021315364 = product of: 0.08526146 = sum of: 0.08526146 = weight(_text_:authors in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.08526146 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of: 0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of: 4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218) 0.053045183 = queryNorm 0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285) 0.25 = coord(1/4) 0.058021847 = sum of: 0.0077136164 = weight(_text_:a in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0077136164 = score(doc=2285,freq=4.0), product of: 0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.053045183 = queryNorm 0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285) 0.05030823 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.05030823 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of: 0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.053045183 = queryNorm 0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
- Abstract
- The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Type
- a
-
Creider, L.S.: Cataloging, reception, and the boundaries of a "work" (2006)
0.00
0.0027271751 = product of: 0.0054543503 = sum of: 0.0054543503 = product of: 0.0109087005 = sum of: 0.0109087005 = weight(_text_:a in 5769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0109087005 = score(doc=5769,freq=8.0), product of: 0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.053045183 = queryNorm 0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5769, product of: 2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of: 8.0 = termFreq=8.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5769) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The concept of a "work" is fundamental to cataloging and users, but there is no clear understanding of the point at which one work becomes another. Various factors influence the setting of the boundaries of a work including that of the reception of the work. Brief investigations of the transmission and study of works such as medieval saints' lives and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle as well as works conceived in electronic form give insight into the processes involved and provide some clues for how catalogers can cope with these factors.
- Type
- a
-
Creider, L.S.: ¬A comparison of the Paris Principles and the International Cataloguing Principles (2009)
0.00
0.0026992036 = product of: 0.005398407 = sum of: 0.005398407 = product of: 0.010796814 = sum of: 0.010796814 = weight(_text_:a in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.010796814 = score(doc=2985,freq=6.0), product of: 0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.053045183 = queryNorm 0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of: 2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of: 6.0 = termFreq=6.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2985) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- After more than forty-five years of cataloging experience with the Paris Principles and their impact on the international sharing of bibliographic data, the process of replacing them with a wider and deeper set of International Cataloguing Principles is nearing completion. This paper compares the scope, technological context, process of decision-making, conceptual framework, and amount of change involved in the adoption of the two different statements.
- Type
- a