Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Creider, L.S."
  1. Creider, L.S.: Family names and the cataloger (2007) 0.01 
    0.007615386 = product of:
  0.019038465 = sum of:
    0.0044680727 = weight(_text_:a in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044680727 = score(doc=2285,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03072615 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
    0.014570392 = product of:
      0.029140783 = sum of:
        0.029140783 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029140783 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  2. Creider, L.S.: Cataloging, reception, and the boundaries of a "work" (2006) 0.00 
    0.0012637618 = product of:
  0.0063188085 = sum of:
    0.0063188085 = weight(_text_:a in 5769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0063188085 = score(doc=5769,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03072615 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5769, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5769)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The concept of a "work" is fundamental to cataloging and users, but there is no clear understanding of the point at which one work becomes another. Various factors influence the setting of the boundaries of a work including that of the reception of the work. Brief investigations of the transmission and study of works such as medieval saints' lives and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle as well as works conceived in electronic form give insight into the processes involved and provide some clues for how catalogers can cope with these factors.
    Type
    a
  3. Creider, L.S.: ¬A comparison of the Paris Principles and the International Cataloguing Principles (2009) 0.00 
    0.0012507999 = product of:
  0.006253999 = sum of:
    0.006253999 = weight(_text_:a in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006253999 = score(doc=2985,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03072615 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    After more than forty-five years of cataloging experience with the Paris Principles and their impact on the international sharing of bibliographic data, the process of replacing them with a wider and deeper set of International Cataloguing Principles is nearing completion. This paper compares the scope, technological context, process of decision-making, conceptual framework, and amount of change involved in the adoption of the two different statements.
    Type
    a

Themes