Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- author's%3a%22Zurawski%2c A.%22 2
- authors%3a%22Zurawski%2c A.%22 2
-
Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000)
0.04
0.035984084 = product of: 0.07196817 = sum of: 0.07196817 = sum of: 0.009567685 = weight(_text_:a in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.009567685 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of: 0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.046056706 = queryNorm 0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277) 0.06240048 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.06240048 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of: 0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.046056706 = queryNorm 0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2001 20:22:57
- Footnote
- Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
- Type
- a
-
Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Who dunnit? : Metatags and hyperauthorship (2001)
0.00
0.0031324127 = product of: 0.0062648254 = sum of: 0.0062648254 = product of: 0.012529651 = sum of: 0.012529651 = weight(_text_:a in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.012529651 = score(doc=6031,freq=14.0), product of: 0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.046056706 = queryNorm 0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of: 3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of: 14.0 = termFreq=14.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6031) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Multiple authorship is a topic of growing concern in a number of scientific domains. When, as is increasingly common, scholarly articles and clinical reports have scores or even hundreds of authors-what Cronin (in press) has termed "hyperauthorship" -the precise nature of each individual's contribution is often masked. A notation that describes collaborators' contributions and allows those contributions to be tracked in, and across, texts (and over time) offers a solution. Such a notation should be useful, easy to use, and acceptable to communities of scientists. Drawing on earlier work, we present a proposal for an XML-like "contribution" mark-up, and discuss the potential benefits and possible drawbacks
- Type
- a
Themes
- Information 1
- Informetrie 1
- Metadaten 1