Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Cronin, B."
  • × author_ss:"Davenport, E."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.02 
    0.016679661 = product of:
  0.033359323 = sum of:
    0.033359323 = product of:
      0.066718645 = sum of:
        0.066718645 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066718645 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17244364 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04924387 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
  2. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Who dunnit? : Metatags and hyperauthorship (2001) 0.01 
    0.009893934 = product of:
  0.019787868 = sum of:
    0.019787868 = product of:
      0.079151474 = sum of:
        0.079151474 = weight(_text_:authors in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079151474 = score(doc=6031,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22449365 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04924387 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Multiple authorship is a topic of growing concern in a number of scientific domains. When, as is increasingly common, scholarly articles and clinical reports have scores or even hundreds of authors-what Cronin (in press) has termed "hyperauthorship" -the precise nature of each individual's contribution is often masked. A notation that describes collaborators' contributions and allows those contributions to be tracked in, and across, texts (and over time) offers a solution. Such a notation should be useful, easy to use, and acceptable to communities of scientists. Drawing on earlier work, we present a proposal for an XML-like "contribution" mark-up, and discuss the potential benefits and possible drawbacks

Themes