Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Cronin, B."
  • × author_ss:"Davenport, E."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.04 
    0.038348205 = product of:
  0.07669641 = sum of:
    0.07669641 = sum of:
      0.010196273 = weight(_text_:a in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010196273 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.066500135 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.066500135 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17187886 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
    Footnote
    Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
    Type
    a
  2. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Who dunnit? : Metatags and hyperauthorship (2001) 0.02 
    0.022454867 = sum of:
  0.015778448 = product of:
    0.07889224 = sum of:
      0.07889224 = weight(_text_:authors in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07889224 = score(doc=6031,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2237584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.0066764182 = product of:
    0.0133528365 = sum of:
      0.0133528365 = weight(_text_:a in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0133528365 = score(doc=6031,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.05659453 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04908259 = queryNorm
          0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Multiple authorship is a topic of growing concern in a number of scientific domains. When, as is increasingly common, scholarly articles and clinical reports have scores or even hundreds of authors-what Cronin (in press) has termed "hyperauthorship" -the precise nature of each individual's contribution is often masked. A notation that describes collaborators' contributions and allows those contributions to be tracked in, and across, texts (and over time) offers a solution. Such a notation should be useful, easy to use, and acceptable to communities of scientists. Drawing on earlier work, we present a proposal for an XML-like "contribution" mark-up, and discuss the potential benefits and possible drawbacks
    Type
    a

Themes