Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Cronin, B."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Cronin, B.: Vernacular and vehicular language (2009) 0.02 
    0.021728842 = product of:
  0.043457683 = sum of:
    0.043457683 = product of:
      0.08691537 = sum of:
        0.08691537 = weight(_text_:22 in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08691537 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 11:44:11
  2. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.02 
    0.0155206015 = product of:
  0.031041203 = sum of:
    0.031041203 = product of:
      0.062082406 = sum of:
        0.062082406 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062082406 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
  3. Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists (2006) 0.01 
    0.012499675 = product of:
  0.02499935 = sum of:
    0.02499935 = product of:
      0.0499987 = sum of:
        0.0499987 = weight(_text_:h in 196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0499987 = score(doc=196,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 196, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The authors apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information science. Faculty rankings based on raw citation counts are compared with those based on h-counts. There is a strong positive correlation between the two sets of rankings. It is shown how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholar's research output over time in more nuanced fashion than straight citation counts.

Authors

Themes