Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Cronin, B."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists (2006) 0.05 
    0.04953232 = product of:
  0.14859696 = sum of:
    0.14859696 = weight(_text_:index in 196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14859696 = score(doc=196,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05083213 = queryNorm
        0.6689808 = fieldWeight in 196, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=196)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The authors apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information science. Faculty rankings based on raw citation counts are compared with those based on h-counts. There is a strong positive correlation between the two sets of rankings. It is shown how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholar's research output over time in more nuanced fashion than straight citation counts.
  2. Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Applying the author affiliation index to library and information science journals (2008) 0.04 
    0.040442966 = product of:
  0.1213289 = sum of:
    0.1213289 = weight(_text_:index in 2361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1213289 = score(doc=2361,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05083213 = queryNorm
        0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 2361, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2361)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The authors use a novel method - the Author Affiliation Index (AAI) - to determine whether faculty at the top-10 North American library and information science (LIS) programs have a disproportionate presence in the premier journals of the field. The study finds that LIS may be both too small and too interdisciplinary a domain for the AAI to provide reliable results.
  3. Cronin, B.; Weaver-Wozniak, S.: Online access to acknowledgements (1993) 0.03 
    0.025022808 = product of:
  0.07506842 = sum of:
    0.07506842 = weight(_text_:index in 7827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07506842 = score(doc=7827,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05083213 = queryNorm
        0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 7827, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7827)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reviews the scale, range and consistency of acknowledgement behaviour, in citations, for a number of academic disciplines. The qualitative and quantitative evidence suggests a pervasive and consistent practice in which acknowledgements define a variety of social, cognitive and instrumental relationships between scholars and within and across disciplines. As such they may be used alongside other bibliometric indicators, such as citations, to map networks of influence. Considers the case for using acknowledgements data in the assessment of academic performance and proposes an online acknowledgement index to facilitate this process, perhaps as a logical extension of ISI's citation indexing products

Authors

Years