Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Crook, M."
  1. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.01 
    0.0078100166 = product of:
  0.035145074 = sum of:
    0.016567415 = weight(_text_:of in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016567415 = score(doc=7683,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
    0.018577661 = product of:
      0.037155323 = sum of:
        0.037155323 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037155323 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
    Footnote
    Presentation given as part of the OCLC Office of Research Distinguished Seminar Series Jan 1997
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
  2. Crook, M.: ¬The OCLC Online Union Catalog : an incomparable library resource (1995) 0.00 
    0.0029752206 = product of:
  0.026776984 = sum of:
    0.026776984 = weight(_text_:of in 4918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026776984 = score(doc=4918,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.43708345 = fieldWeight in 4918, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4918)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    The OCLC OLUC is arguably the world's foremost bibliographic database in terms of number of participating libraries,a nd depth and breadth of coverage. As of 30 June 1994, the OLUC contained more than 29 million records and grows at a rate of approximately 31.000 records a week. Statistics are presented for distribution of OLUC records by date and place of publication; languages represented in OLUC; the number of records for each format; the number of bibliographic records of composers and authors; and the most frequently occuring topical subject headings

Themes