Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.04
    0.03551022 = product of:
      0.10653065 = sum of:
        0.04738532 = weight(_text_:und in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04738532 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
        0.059145328 = product of:
          0.118290655 = sum of:
            0.118290655 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.118290655 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.03
    0.031094778 = product of:
      0.062189557 = sum of:
        0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008924231 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
        0.02369266 = weight(_text_:und in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02369266 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
        0.029572664 = product of:
          0.059145328 = sum of:
            0.059145328 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059145328 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  3. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die "doppelt notierte Einheitsklassifikation" : die Lösung? (1975) 0.01
    0.012300599 = product of:
      0.036901798 = sum of:
        0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010096614 = score(doc=1620,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
        0.026805183 = weight(_text_:und in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026805183 = score(doc=1620,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Im Oktober 1974 haben maßgebliche deutsche Bibliothekare der Erarbeitung einer Einheitsklassifikation für die Bibliotheken der BRD entsprechend den Vorschlägen einer AfB-Projektgruppe zugestimmt. Danach kann nun eine "doppelt notierte" Klassifikation in Angriff genommen werden, die auf den Klassaten des systematischen Kataloges der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek (BSB) aufbaut und für vorliegende Titelmengen pro Klassat neue Klassen in einer dreigliedrigen Notation für Aufstellungszwecke festlegt. Die BSB-Systematik wird erläutert und kritisch zur Sachproblematik der vorgeschlagenen Lösung Stellung genommen. Auf organisatorische Schwierigkeiten wird hingewiesen; abschließend werden andere Lösungsmöglichkeiten diskutiert
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.01
    0.009857555 = product of:
      0.059145328 = sum of:
        0.059145328 = product of:
          0.118290655 = sum of:
            0.118290655 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.118290655 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Vorschlag für eine Klassifikation der Dokumentenarten und der Dokumentenkunde (1970) 0.01
    0.008935061 = product of:
      0.053610366 = sum of:
        0.053610366 = weight(_text_:und in 3462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053610366 = score(doc=3462,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 3462, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3462)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Issue
    Deutsch und englisch.
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Einheitsklassifikation (1979) 0.01
    0.006701296 = product of:
      0.040207777 = sum of:
        0.040207777 = weight(_text_:und in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040207777 = score(doc=1922,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Series
    Beiträge zum Buch- und Bibliothekswesen; Bd.17
    Source
    Bestandserschließung und Bibliotheksstruktur: Rolf Kluth zum 10.2.1979. Hrsg.: R. Alsheimer
  7. Dahlberg, I.: Über Gegenstände, Begriffe, Definitionen und Benennungen: zur möglichen Neufassung von DIN 2330 (1976) 0.01
    0.006318042 = product of:
      0.037908252 = sum of:
        0.037908252 = weight(_text_:und in 1390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037908252 = score(doc=1390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1390)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  8. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffstheoretische Grundlagen der Klassifikation (1977) 0.01
    0.0054715853 = product of:
      0.032829512 = sum of:
        0.032829512 = weight(_text_:und in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032829512 = score(doc=1522,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Es wird davon ausgegangen, daß Begriffe mit Hilfe von Prädikationen über Bezugsgegenstände gebildet werden, wobei eine jede Prädikation ein Begriffsmerkmal liefert. Existenz und Arten von Begriffsrelationen werden erläuter und Begriffe nach ihrem Kategorialbezug typisiert. Eien Anwendung dieser analytischen Begriffstheorie würde zu einem reproduzierbaren Aufbau von Begriffssystemen/Ordnungssystemen führen, auch hat sie Auswirkungen auf Definitions- und Benennungslehre (Terminologie). Ausblick auf internationale Aktivitäten auf diesem Gebiet
  9. Dahlberg, I.: Zur Terminologie der Klassifikation (1973) 0.00
    0.0020823204 = product of:
      0.012493922 = sum of:
        0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 1930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012493922 = score(doc=1930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1930)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Beling, G. u. P.-T. Hagen in Nachrichten für Dokumentation 24(1973) S.117-126
  10. Dahlberg, I.: Zur Theorie des Begriffs (1974) 0.00
    0.0012620769 = product of:
      0.0075724614 = sum of:
        0.0075724614 = weight(_text_:in in 1617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0075724614 = score(doc=1617,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 1617, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1617)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    A concept is regarded as the common element of both classification systems and thesauri. Reality and knowledge are not represented by words or terms but by the meanings "behind" these tokens. A concept of, say, an object, a property of an object, a process, etc. is derived from verbal statements on these as subjects and may therefore be defined as the whole of true and possible predicates that can be collected on a given subject. It is from these predicates that the characteristics of the corresponding concepts can be derived. Common characteristics in different concepts lead to relationsbetween concepts, which relations in turn are factors for the formation of concept systems. Different kinds of relationships as well as different kinds of concepts are distinguished. It is pointed out that an orderly supply of the elements for propositions (informative statements) on new knowledge requires the construction and availability of such concept systems