Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.01
    0.013847098 = product of:
      0.05077269 = sum of:
        0.0078101465 = weight(_text_:a in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0078101465 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
        0.006944071 = weight(_text_:s in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006944071 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.24024783 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
        0.036018472 = product of:
          0.072036944 = sum of:
            0.072036944 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072036944 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
    Type
    a
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Towards a future for knowledge organization (2006) 0.01
    0.009104414 = product of:
      0.03338285 = sum of:
        0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005411029 = score(doc=1476,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=1476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
        0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194194 = score(doc=1476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Pages
    S.1-16
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Eds.: K.S. Raghavan u. K.N. Prasad
    Type
    a
  3. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975) 0.01
    0.007987227 = product of:
      0.029286498 = sum of:
        0.0070291325 = weight(_text_:a in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070291325 = score(doc=2103,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
        0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019311246 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
        0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00294612 = score(doc=2103,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields
    Footnote
    Vgl.den digitalisierten Wiederabdruck in: Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.1, S.56-63.
    Source
    International classification. 2(1975), S.31-37
    Type
    a
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Library catalogs in the Internet : switching for future subject access (1996) 0.01
    0.007642254 = product of:
      0.028021596 = sum of:
        0.0066271294 = weight(_text_:a in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066271294 = score(doc=5171,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
        0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019311246 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    A multitude of library catalogs are now being entered into the Internet. Their differing classification and subject headings systems used for subject access call for a switching system, a black box to facilitate the location of subject fields and their subjects in these systems. The principles on which such a switching system must be built in order to provide the necessary insight, surveyability, reproducebility and ease of concept combinability (e.g. in cases of interdisciplinary subjects) are outlined and compared with the BSO which hance once been established by the FID in order to serve a switching purpose. The advantages of using the Information Coding Classification (ICC) as a switching system in the Internet are demonstrated, likewise the methodology needed to establish the necessary correlation between library classification systems (and if possible also subject heading systems and thesauri) and the ICC. Finally some organizational implications for creating a switching for 6 universal systems in use are described
    Pages
    S.155-164
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
    Type
    a
  5. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view (1992) 0.01
    0.007412176 = product of:
      0.027177978 = sum of:
        0.0061991126 = weight(_text_:a in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061991126 = score(doc=2100,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=2100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
        0.018895645 = weight(_text_:u in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018895645 = score(doc=2100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The implications of contributions from philosophy of science to classification theory and the construction of a new universal classification system are discussed. Starting from the purposes of universal systems and what has been considered so far to serve as main classes of the six existing major universal systems, the following theories have been treated: Theory of (1) knowledge, (2) knowledge elements and units, (3) systems, (4) the science concept, (5) knowledge fields including criteria for their identification, (6) a logical syntax, (7) an overall structure of object and aspect areas. Concludingly an evaluation was made with special regard to the representability (notation) of such a theory-based universal concept system by computer and in telecommunication. This, as well as the heuristics contained in such a theory-based system facilitate its general applicability
    Pages
    S.187-197
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
    Type
    a
  6. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (2015) 0.01
    0.0066560227 = product of:
      0.024405416 = sum of:
        0.0058576106 = weight(_text_:a in 2104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058576106 = score(doc=2104,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 2104, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2104)
        0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 2104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016092705 = score(doc=2104,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2104, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2104)
        0.0024550997 = weight(_text_:s in 2104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024550997 = score(doc=2104,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 2104, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2104)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields.
    Content
    Digitalisierter Wiederabdruck von: Dahlberg, I.: The terminology of subject-fields. In: International classificatioin. 2 (1975) no. 1, S.31-37. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_42_2015_1_f.pdf.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.1, S.56-63
    Type
    a
  7. Dahlberg, I.: ¬A faceted classification of general concepts (2011) 0.01
    0.006451869 = product of:
      0.023656853 = sum of:
        0.0061744633 = weight(_text_:a in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061744633 = score(doc=4824,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
        0.015746372 = weight(_text_:u in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015746372 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    General concepts are all those form-categorial concepts which - attached to a specific concept of a classification system or thesaurus - can help to widen, sometimes even in a syntactical sense, the understanding of a case. In some existing universal classification systems such concepts have been named "auxiliaries" or "common isolates" as in the Colon Classification (CC). However, by such auxiliaries, different kinds of such concepts are listed, e.g. concepts of space and time, concepts of races and languages and concepts of kinds of documents, next to them also concepts of kinds of general activities, properties, persons, and institutions. Such latter kinds form part of the nine aspects ruling the facets in the Information Coding Classification (ICC) through the principle of using a Systematiser for the subdivision of subject groups and fields. Based on this principle and using and extending existing systems of such concepts, e.g. which A. Diemer had presented to the German Thesaurus Committee as well as those found in the UDC, in CC and attached to the Subject Heading System of the German National Library, a faceted classification is proposed for critical assessment, necessary improvement and possible later use in classification systems and thesauri.
    Pages
    S.177-191
    Source
    Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands. Eds.: A. Slavic u. E. Civallero
    Type
    a
  8. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.01
    0.005011512 = product of:
      0.018375544 = sum of:
        0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039050733 = score(doc=1493,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=1493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
        0.012734452 = product of:
          0.025468905 = sum of:
            0.025468905 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025468905 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    A lot of information that is already available on the Web, or retrieved from local information systems and social networks is structured in data silos that are not semantically related. Semantic technologies make it emerge that the use of typed links that directly express their relations are an advantage for every application that can reuse the incorporated knowledge about the data. For this reason, data integration, through reengineering (e.g. triplify), or querying (e.g. D2R) is an important task in order to make information available for everyone. Thus, in order to build a semantic map of the data, we need knowledge about data items itself and the relation between heterogeneous data items. In this paper, we present our work of providing Lexical Linked Data (LLD) through a meta-model that contains all the resources and gives the possibility to retrieve and navigate them from different perspectives. We combine the existing work done on knowledge domains (based on the Information Coding Classification) within the Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (based on the RDF/OWL EurowordNet and the related integrated lexical resources (MultiWordNet, EuroWordNet, MEMODATA Lexicon, Hamburg Methaphor DB).
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Pages
    S.258-265
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  9. Dahlberg, I.: Principles for the construction of a universal classification system : a proposal (1978) 0.00
    0.002605482 = product of:
      0.014330151 = sum of:
        0.0094693005 = weight(_text_:a in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0094693005 = score(doc=67,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=67,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Pages
    S.450-471
    Type
    a
  10. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The International Classification and Indexing Bibliography (ICIB) and its classification system (1985) 0.00
    0.002146068 = product of:
      0.011803374 = sum of:
        0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062481174 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
        0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055552567 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    International classification. 12(1985), S.143-152
    Type
    a
  11. Dahlberg, I.: Major developments in classification (1977) 0.00
    0.002146068 = product of:
      0.011803374 = sum of:
        0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 1619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062481174 = score(doc=1619,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1619, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1619)
        0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 1619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055552567 = score(doc=1619,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1619, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1619)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 7(1977), S.41-103
    Type
    a
  12. Dahlberg, I.: Ingetraut Dahlberg : a brief self report (1998) 0.00
    0.002051306 = product of:
      0.011282182 = sum of:
        0.0078101465 = weight(_text_:a in 2510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0078101465 = score(doc=2510,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 2510, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2510)
        0.0034720355 = weight(_text_:s in 2510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034720355 = score(doc=2510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 2510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2510)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Ingetraut Dahlberg presents a brief description of her career and involvement with cataloguing and classification schemes
    Footnote
    Articles included in an issue devoted to part 1 of a 2 part series celebrating people who have been leaders in the field of cataloguing and classification
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 25(1998) nos.2/3, S.151-155
    Type
    a
  13. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The compatibility guidelines : a re-evaluation (1996) 0.00
    0.0019624678 = product of:
      0.010793572 = sum of:
        0.0066271294 = weight(_text_:a in 6047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066271294 = score(doc=6047,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 6047, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6047)
        0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 6047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041664424 = score(doc=6047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 6047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6047)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Pages
    S. -
    Type
    a
  14. Dahlberg, I.: On the theory of the concept (1979) 0.00
    0.0019233326 = product of:
      0.010578329 = sum of:
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
        0.00589224 = weight(_text_:s in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00589224 = score(doc=1615,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Footnote
    In deutsch auch in: International classification 1(1974) S.12-19.
    Pages
    S.54-63
    Type
    a
  15. Dahlberg, I.: Toward establishment of compatibility between indexing languages (1981) 0.00
    0.0018963597 = product of:
      0.010429978 = sum of:
        0.0076523502 = weight(_text_:a in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076523502 = score(doc=5218,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=5218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines previous work done in the field of compatibility between indexing langugaes (IL), and describes the scope, limitations and advantages of establishing compatibility between IL. Suggests methods for verbal comparisons between IL as well as generation of an alphabetical comparison matrix M1. Conceptual comparisons, however, demand a conceptual reorganization of M1 into a compatibiliy matrix M2 with its two alternatices, namely a system-related matrix M3 and a hierarchical matrix M4. In conclusion, the use of a compatibility matrix and organizational problems are described
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981) no.2, S.86-91
    Type
    a
  16. Dahlberg, I.: Concept and definition theory (1989) 0.00
    0.0018778095 = product of:
      0.010327952 = sum of:
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=962,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 962, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=962)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=962,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 962, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=962)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Pages
    S.12-24
    Type
    a
  17. Dahlberg, I.: Interview with Ingetraut Dahlberg, December 2007 (2008) 0.00
    0.0018778095 = product of:
      0.010327952 = sum of:
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 6085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=6085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6085)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 6085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=6085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 6085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6085)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 35(2008) nos.2/3, S.82-85
    Type
    a
  18. Dahlberg, I.: Historical paradigms in the philosophy of classification (1994) 0.00
    0.0018778095 = product of:
      0.010327952 = sum of:
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 8899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=8899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 8899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8899)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 8899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=8899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 8899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8899)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Pages
    S. -
    Type
    a
  19. Dahlberg, I.: Wissen und Bildung in einer informatisierten Welt (1999) 0.00
    0.0018778095 = product of:
      0.010327952 = sum of:
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 4120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=4120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4120)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 4120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=4120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4120)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.48-49
    Type
    a
  20. Dahlberg, I.: Knowledge organization : a new science? (2006) 0.00
    0.0016593148 = product of:
      0.009126231 = sum of:
        0.006695806 = weight(_text_:a in 3375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006695806 = score(doc=3375,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 3375, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3375)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 3375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=3375,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3375, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3375)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    In ISKO's name, the term "Knowledge Organization" (KO) denotes already the object and the activity area significant for the existence of any science. Both areas are outlined and their specific contents shown. Also a survey of its special subfields is given. The sciencetheoretical foundation of Knowledge Organization as a new scientific discipline is based on the propositional concept of science. Within a universal system of the sciences, KO has been regarded as a subfield of Science of Science. Concludingly it is proposed to find the necessary institution for work in concerted effort of scientists, knowledge organizers and terminologists on the collection, definition, and systematization of concepts of all subject fields, utilizing the Information Coding Classification (ICC) as the necessary categorizing structure.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 33(2006) no.1, S.11-19
    Type
    a