Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The compatibility guidelines : a re-evaluation (1996) 0.02
    0.015154215 = product of:
      0.07577107 = sum of:
        0.07577107 = weight(_text_:7 in 6047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07577107 = score(doc=6047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.43921518 = fieldWeight in 6047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6047)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7. 1.1997 17:39:26
  2. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view (1992) 0.01
    0.0075771073 = product of:
      0.037885536 = sum of:
        0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037885536 = score(doc=2100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The implications of contributions from philosophy of science to classification theory and the construction of a new universal classification system are discussed. Starting from the purposes of universal systems and what has been considered so far to serve as main classes of the six existing major universal systems, the following theories have been treated: Theory of (1) knowledge, (2) knowledge elements and units, (3) systems, (4) the science concept, (5) knowledge fields including criteria for their identification, (6) a logical syntax, (7) an overall structure of object and aspect areas. Concludingly an evaluation was made with special regard to the representability (notation) of such a theory-based universal concept system by computer and in telecommunication. This, as well as the heuristics contained in such a theory-based system facilitate its general applicability