Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.04 
    0.03522037 = product of:
  0.07044074 = sum of:
    0.07044074 = product of:
      0.14088148 = sum of:
        0.14088148 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14088148 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Concepts and terms : ISKO's major challenge (2009) 0.02 
    0.015969815 = product of:
  0.03193963 = sum of:
    0.03193963 = product of:
      0.06387926 = sum of:
        0.06387926 = weight(_text_:f in 3273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06387926 = score(doc=3273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 3273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3273)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Starting from the premise that extant knowledge of the discipline of Knowledge Organization ought to be made accessible by its knowledge units (concepts) this article includes short descriptions of the work of E.Wuester (Austria) and F. Riggs (USA) who both had laid foundations in this field. A noematic concept of knowledge (Diemer 1962, 474) is used for the necessary work to be done. It is shown how a concept-theoretical approach (relying on the characteristics of concepts and their system-building capacity) can be applied for pertinent terminological work. Earlier work in this regard by standardization bodies is mentioned. Seven necessary steps towards accomplishment are outlined.
  3. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.01 
    0.01245228 = product of:
  0.02490456 = sum of:
    0.02490456 = product of:
      0.04980912 = sum of:
        0.04980912 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04980912 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Dahlberg, I.: DIN 32705: the German standard on classification systems : a critical appraisal (1992) 0.01 
    0.008953625 = product of:
  0.01790725 = sum of:
    0.01790725 = product of:
      0.071629 = sum of:
        0.071629 = weight(_text_:authors in 2669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071629 = score(doc=2669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2669)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The German standard on the construction and further development of classification systems is introduced with its background. The contents of its 8 chapters is described. A critical appraisal considers (1) the fact that the standard does not openly deal with the optimal form of CS, viz. faceted CS, but treats them as one possibility among others, although the authors seem to have had this kind in mind when recommending the section on steps of CS development and other sections of the standard; (2) that the standard does not give any recommendation on the computerization of the necessary activities in establishing CS; and (3) that a convergence of CS and thesauri in the form of faceted CS and faceted thesauri has not been taken into consideration. - Concludingly some doubts are raised whether a standard would be the best medium to provide recommendations or guidelines for the construction of such systems. More adequate ways for this should be explored

Years

Themes