-
Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978)
0.04
0.035305377 = product of:
0.070610754 = sum of:
0.070610754 = product of:
0.14122151 = sum of:
0.14122151 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14122151 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
-
Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975)
0.04
0.035305377 = product of:
0.070610754 = sum of:
0.070610754 = product of:
0.14122151 = sum of:
0.14122151 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14122151 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
-
Dahlberg, I.: Zur Terminologie der Klassifikation (1973)
0.03
0.02843072 = product of:
0.05686144 = sum of:
0.05686144 = product of:
0.11372288 = sum of:
0.11372288 = weight(_text_:g in 1930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11372288 = score(doc=1930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 1930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Beling, G. u. P.-T. Hagen in Nachrichten für Dokumentation 24(1973) S.117-126
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975)
0.01
0.012184594 = product of:
0.024369188 = sum of:
0.024369188 = product of:
0.048738375 = sum of:
0.048738375 = weight(_text_:g in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048738375 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields