-
Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978)
0.04
0.03551022 = product of:
0.10653065 = sum of:
0.04738532 = weight(_text_:und in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04738532 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
0.059145328 = product of:
0.118290655 = sum of:
0.118290655 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.118290655 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die "doppelt notierte Einheitsklassifikation" : die Lösung? (1975)
0.01
0.012300599 = product of:
0.036901798 = sum of:
0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010096614 = score(doc=1620,freq=4.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
0.026805183 = weight(_text_:und in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026805183 = score(doc=1620,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Im Oktober 1974 haben maßgebliche deutsche Bibliothekare der Erarbeitung einer Einheitsklassifikation für die Bibliotheken der BRD entsprechend den Vorschlägen einer AfB-Projektgruppe zugestimmt. Danach kann nun eine "doppelt notierte" Klassifikation in Angriff genommen werden, die auf den Klassaten des systematischen Kataloges der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek (BSB) aufbaut und für vorliegende Titelmengen pro Klassat neue Klassen in einer dreigliedrigen Notation für Aufstellungszwecke festlegt. Die BSB-Systematik wird erläutert und kritisch zur Sachproblematik der vorgeschlagenen Lösung Stellung genommen. Auf organisatorische Schwierigkeiten wird hingewiesen; abschließend werden andere Lösungsmöglichkeiten diskutiert
-
Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975)
0.01
0.009857555 = product of:
0.059145328 = sum of:
0.059145328 = product of:
0.118290655 = sum of:
0.118290655 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.118290655 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
-
Dahlberg, I.: Einheitsklassifikation (1979)
0.01
0.006701296 = product of:
0.040207777 = sum of:
0.040207777 = weight(_text_:und in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040207777 = score(doc=1922,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Series
- Beiträge zum Buch- und Bibliothekswesen; Bd.17
- Source
- Bestandserschließung und Bibliotheksstruktur: Rolf Kluth zum 10.2.1979. Hrsg.: R. Alsheimer
-
Dahlberg, I.: Über Gegenstände, Begriffe, Definitionen und Benennungen: zur möglichen Neufassung von DIN 2330 (1976)
0.01
0.006318042 = product of:
0.037908252 = sum of:
0.037908252 = weight(_text_:und in 1390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037908252 = score(doc=1390,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1390, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1390)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffstheoretische Grundlagen der Klassifikation (1977)
0.01
0.0054715853 = product of:
0.032829512 = sum of:
0.032829512 = weight(_text_:und in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032829512 = score(doc=1522,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Es wird davon ausgegangen, daß Begriffe mit Hilfe von Prädikationen über Bezugsgegenstände gebildet werden, wobei eine jede Prädikation ein Begriffsmerkmal liefert. Existenz und Arten von Begriffsrelationen werden erläuter und Begriffe nach ihrem Kategorialbezug typisiert. Eien Anwendung dieser analytischen Begriffstheorie würde zu einem reproduzierbaren Aufbau von Begriffssystemen/Ordnungssystemen führen, auch hat sie Auswirkungen auf Definitions- und Benennungslehre (Terminologie). Ausblick auf internationale Aktivitäten auf diesem Gebiet
-
Dahlberg, I.: Major developments in classification (1977)
0.00
0.003365538 = product of:
0.020193228 = sum of:
0.020193228 = weight(_text_:in in 1619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020193228 = score(doc=1619,freq=4.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.34006363 = fieldWeight in 1619, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1619)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 7(1977), S.41-103
-
Dahlberg, I.: On the theory of the concept (1979)
0.00
0.0025241538 = product of:
0.015144923 = sum of:
0.015144923 = weight(_text_:in in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015144923 = score(doc=1615,freq=4.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- In deutsch auch in: International classification 1(1974) S.12-19.
-
Dahlberg, I.: Zur Terminologie der Klassifikation (1973)
0.00
0.0020823204 = product of:
0.012493922 = sum of:
0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 1930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012493922 = score(doc=1930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1930)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Beling, G. u. P.-T. Hagen in Nachrichten für Dokumentation 24(1973) S.117-126
-
Dahlberg, I.: Classification theory, yesterday and today (1976)
0.00
0.0020609628 = product of:
0.012365777 = sum of:
0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 1618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012365777 = score(doc=1618,freq=6.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 1618, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1618)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Until very recently, classification theory was held to be nothing but an expressed or unconscious knowledge framed in intuitively given reasons for the subdivision and arrangement of any universe. Today, after clarification of the elements of classification systems as well as the basis of concept relationshios it is possible to apply a number of principles in the evaluation of existing systems as well as in the construction of new ones and by this achieving relatively predictable and repeatable results
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975)
0.00
0.0019955188 = product of:
0.011973113 = sum of:
0.011973113 = weight(_text_:in in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011973113 = score(doc=2103,freq=10.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields
- Footnote
- Vgl.den digitalisierten Wiederabdruck in: Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.1, S.56-63.
-
Dahlberg, I.: Zur Theorie des Begriffs (1974)
0.00
0.0012620769 = product of:
0.0075724614 = sum of:
0.0075724614 = weight(_text_:in in 1617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075724614 = score(doc=1617,freq=4.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 1617, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1617)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- A concept is regarded as the common element of both classification systems and thesauri. Reality and knowledge are not represented by words or terms but by the meanings "behind" these tokens. A concept of, say, an object, a property of an object, a process, etc. is derived from verbal statements on these as subjects and may therefore be defined as the whole of true and possible predicates that can be collected on a given subject. It is from these predicates that the characteristics of the corresponding concepts can be derived. Common characteristics in different concepts lead to relationsbetween concepts, which relations in turn are factors for the formation of concept systems. Different kinds of relationships as well as different kinds of concepts are distinguished. It is pointed out that an orderly supply of the elements for propositions (informative statements) on new knowledge requires the construction and availability of such concept systems
