-
Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978)
0.03
0.03432954 = product of:
0.06865908 = sum of:
0.06865908 = product of:
0.13731816 = sum of:
0.13731816 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13731816 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17745897 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050676074 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
-
Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975)
0.03
0.03432954 = product of:
0.06865908 = sum of:
0.06865908 = product of:
0.13731816 = sum of:
0.13731816 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13731816 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17745897 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050676074 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
-
Dahlberg, I.: Einheitsklassifikation (1979)
0.02
0.01840573 = product of:
0.03681146 = sum of:
0.03681146 = product of:
0.07362292 = sum of:
0.07362292 = weight(_text_:r in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07362292 = score(doc=1922,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.050676074 = queryNorm
0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bestandserschließung und Bibliotheksstruktur: Rolf Kluth zum 10.2.1979. Hrsg.: R. Alsheimer
-
Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974)
0.02
0.01716477 = product of:
0.03432954 = sum of:
0.03432954 = product of:
0.06865908 = sum of:
0.06865908 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06865908 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17745897 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050676074 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975)
0.01
0.009202865 = product of:
0.01840573 = sum of:
0.01840573 = product of:
0.03681146 = sum of:
0.03681146 = weight(_text_:r in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03681146 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.050676074 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields