Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.03
    0.030616803 = product of:
      0.076542005 = sum of:
        0.048695378 = weight(_text_:u in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048695378 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
        0.027846623 = product of:
          0.055693246 = sum of:
            0.055693246 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055693246 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041106213 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
    Theme
    Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Zur Terminologie der Klassifikation (1973) 0.01
    0.013634706 = product of:
      0.06817353 = sum of:
        0.06817353 = weight(_text_:u in 1930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06817353 = score(doc=1930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 1930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1930)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Beling, G. u. P.-T. Hagen in Nachrichten für Dokumentation 24(1973) S.117-126
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Einheitsklassifikation (1979) 0.01
    0.011943938 = product of:
      0.05971969 = sum of:
        0.05971969 = weight(_text_:r in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05971969 = score(doc=1922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Bestandserschließung und Bibliotheksstruktur: Rolf Kluth zum 10.2.1979. Hrsg.: R. Alsheimer
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.01
    0.01113865 = product of:
      0.055693246 = sum of:
        0.055693246 = product of:
          0.11138649 = sum of:
            0.11138649 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11138649 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041106213 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.01
    0.01113865 = product of:
      0.055693246 = sum of:
        0.055693246 = product of:
          0.11138649 = sum of:
            0.11138649 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11138649 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041106213 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
  6. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975) 0.01
    0.005971969 = product of:
      0.029859845 = sum of:
        0.029859845 = weight(_text_:r in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029859845 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields