Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.011027076 = product of:
  0.022054153 = sum of:
    0.022054153 = product of:
      0.044108305 = sum of:
        0.044108305 = weight(_text_:k in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044108305 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Dazu im selben Heft Erwiderungen von: J. Becker u. A. Reiss, W.L. Bühl, V. Dreier, R. Dürr, T. Eckes, W. Friedlmeier, W. Gödert, A. Hahn, H. Kerber, R. Kleinknecht, J. Klüver, J. Krause, S. Lamnek, M.-T. Liske, C. Lütge, R. Meyers, K. Manhart, H.P. Ohly, M. Patzak, R. Popp, F.J. Radermacher, A. Ros, P. Schimany, T.B. Seiler, A. Suchanek, E. Walther-Klaus, H. Weiss; eine Erwiderung von I. Dahlberg u. eine Metakritik von G. Endruweit. - Replik der Verfasserin auf die Erwiderungen: S.67-85

0.0089919055 = product of:
  0.017983811 = sum of:
    0.017983811 = product of:
      0.071935244 = sum of:
        0.071935244 = weight(_text_:authors in 2669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071935244 = score(doc=2669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2669)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The German standard on the construction and further development of classification systems is introduced with its background. The contents of its 8 chapters is described. A critical appraisal considers (1) the fact that the standard does not openly deal with the optimal form of CS, viz. faceted CS, but treats them as one possibility among others, although the authors seem to have had this kind in mind when recommending the section on steps of CS development and other sections of the standard; (2) that the standard does not give any recommendation on the computerization of the necessary activities in establishing CS; and (3) that a convergence of CS and thesauri in the form of faceted CS and faceted thesauri has not been taken into consideration. - Concludingly some doubts are raised whether a standard would be the best medium to provide recommendations or guidelines for the construction of such systems. More adequate ways for this should be explored