Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.04
    0.035305377 = product of:
      0.070610754 = sum of:
        0.070610754 = product of:
          0.14122151 = sum of:
            0.14122151 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14122151 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.04
    0.035305377 = product of:
      0.070610754 = sum of:
        0.070610754 = product of:
          0.14122151 = sum of:
            0.14122151 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14122151 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.04
    0.035305377 = product of:
      0.070610754 = sum of:
        0.070610754 = product of:
          0.14122151 = sum of:
            0.14122151 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14122151 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Zur Terminologie der Klassifikation (1973) 0.03
    0.02843072 = product of:
      0.05686144 = sum of:
        0.05686144 = product of:
          0.11372288 = sum of:
            0.11372288 = weight(_text_:g in 1930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11372288 = score(doc=1930,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 1930, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1930)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Beling, G. u. P.-T. Hagen in Nachrichten für Dokumentation 24(1973) S.117-126
  5. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.02
    0.024713762 = product of:
      0.049427524 = sum of:
        0.049427524 = product of:
          0.09885505 = sum of:
            0.09885505 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09885505 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.02
    0.017652689 = product of:
      0.035305377 = sum of:
        0.035305377 = product of:
          0.070610754 = sum of:
            0.070610754 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070610754 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  7. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01
    0.01412215 = product of:
      0.0282443 = sum of:
        0.0282443 = product of:
          0.0564886 = sum of:
            0.0564886 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0564886 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  8. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.01
    0.012482335 = product of:
      0.02496467 = sum of:
        0.02496467 = product of:
          0.04992934 = sum of:
            0.04992934 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04992934 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  9. Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften : lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen? (1996) 0.01
    0.012184594 = product of:
      0.024369188 = sum of:
        0.024369188 = product of:
          0.048738375 = sum of:
            0.048738375 = weight(_text_:g in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048738375 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Dazu im selben Heft Erwiderungen von: J. Becker u. A. Reiss, W.L. Bühl, V. Dreier, R. Dürr, T. Eckes, W. Friedlmeier, W. Gödert, A. Hahn, H. Kerber, R. Kleinknecht, J. Klüver, J. Krause, S. Lamnek, M.-T. Liske, C. Lütge, R. Meyers, K. Manhart, H.P. Ohly, M. Patzak, R. Popp, F.J. Radermacher, A. Ros, P. Schimany, T.B. Seiler, A. Suchanek, E. Walther-Klaus, H. Weiss; eine Erwiderung von I. Dahlberg u. eine Metakritik von G. Endruweit. - Replik der Verfasserin auf die Erwiderungen: S.67-85
  10. Dahlberg, I.: Ontische Strukturen und Wissensmuster in der Wissensorganisation (2004) 0.01
    0.012184594 = product of:
      0.024369188 = sum of:
        0.024369188 = product of:
          0.048738375 = sum of:
            0.048738375 = weight(_text_:g in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048738375 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensorganisation in kooperativen Lern- und Arbeitsumgebungen: Proceedings der 8. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Regensburg, 9.-11. Oktober 2002. Hrsg.: G. Budin u. H.P. Ohly
  11. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975) 0.01
    0.012184594 = product of:
      0.024369188 = sum of:
        0.024369188 = product of:
          0.048738375 = sum of:
            0.048738375 = weight(_text_:g in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048738375 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields
  12. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.01
    0.010591612 = product of:
      0.021183224 = sum of:
        0.021183224 = product of:
          0.04236645 = sum of:
            0.04236645 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04236645 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13
  13. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (2015) 0.01
    0.010153829 = product of:
      0.020307658 = sum of:
        0.020307658 = product of:
          0.040615316 = sum of:
            0.040615316 = weight(_text_:g in 2104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040615316 = score(doc=2104,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 2104, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2104)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields.
  14. Dahlberg, I.: DIN 32705: the German standard on classification systems : a critical appraisal (1992) 0.01
    0.008975235 = product of:
      0.01795047 = sum of:
        0.01795047 = product of:
          0.07180188 = sum of:
            0.07180188 = weight(_text_:authors in 2669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07180188 = score(doc=2669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2669)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The German standard on the construction and further development of classification systems is introduced with its background. The contents of its 8 chapters is described. A critical appraisal considers (1) the fact that the standard does not openly deal with the optimal form of CS, viz. faceted CS, but treats them as one possibility among others, although the authors seem to have had this kind in mind when recommending the section on steps of CS development and other sections of the standard; (2) that the standard does not give any recommendation on the computerization of the necessary activities in establishing CS; and (3) that a convergence of CS and thesauri in the form of faceted CS and faceted thesauri has not been taken into consideration. - Concludingly some doubts are raised whether a standard would be the best medium to provide recommendations or guidelines for the construction of such systems. More adequate ways for this should be explored