-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: What do we know about the h index? (2007)
0.02
0.02479351 = product of:
0.04958702 = sum of:
0.04958702 = product of:
0.074380524 = sum of:
0.012743411 = weight(_text_:d in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012743411 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.06163711 = weight(_text_:h in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06163711 = score(doc=477,freq=16.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.54347324 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Jorge Hirsch recently proposed the h index to quantify the research output of individual scientists. The new index has attracted a lot of attention in the scientific community. The claim that the h index in a single number provides a good representation of the scientific lifetime achievement of a scientist as well as the (supposed) simple calculation of the h index using common literature databases lead to the danger of improper use of the index. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of the h index and summarize the studies on the convergent validity of this index. We also introduce corrections and complements as well as single-number alternatives to the h index.
- Object
- H-Index
-
Neuhaus, C.; Daniel, H.-D.: Data sources for performing citation analysis : an overview (2008)
0.01
0.011511806 = product of:
0.023023613 = sum of:
0.023023613 = product of:
0.03453542 = sum of:
0.012743411 = weight(_text_:d in 1735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012743411 = score(doc=1735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1735)
0.02179201 = weight(_text_:h in 1735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02179201 = score(doc=1735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1735)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011)
0.01
0.010371897 = product of:
0.020743795 = sum of:
0.020743795 = product of:
0.031115692 = sum of:
0.009102437 = weight(_text_:d in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009102437 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
0.022013254 = weight(_text_:h in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022013254 = score(doc=4132,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.-D.: What is behind the curtain of the Leiden Ranking? (2015)
0.01
0.009867263 = product of:
0.019734526 = sum of:
0.019734526 = product of:
0.029601788 = sum of:
0.010922924 = weight(_text_:d in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010922924 = score(doc=2171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
0.018678864 = weight(_text_:h in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018678864 = score(doc=2171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007)
0.01
0.00822272 = product of:
0.01644544 = sum of:
0.01644544 = product of:
0.024668159 = sum of:
0.009102437 = weight(_text_:d in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009102437 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.015565722 = weight(_text_:h in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015565722 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Universality of citation distributions : a validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry (2009)
0.01
0.00822272 = product of:
0.01644544 = sum of:
0.01644544 = product of:
0.024668159 = sum of:
0.009102437 = weight(_text_:d in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009102437 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
0.015565722 = weight(_text_:h in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015565722 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mutz, R.; Wolbring, T.; Daniel, H.-D.: ¬The effect of the "very important paper" (VIP) designation in Angewandte Chemie International Edition on citation impact : a propensity score matching analysis (2017)
0.01
0.00822272 = product of:
0.01644544 = sum of:
0.01644544 = product of:
0.024668159 = sum of:
0.009102437 = weight(_text_:d in 3792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009102437 = score(doc=3792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 3792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3792)
0.015565722 = weight(_text_:h in 3792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015565722 = score(doc=3792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 3792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3792)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008)
0.01
0.0065781754 = product of:
0.013156351 = sum of:
0.013156351 = product of:
0.019734526 = sum of:
0.0072819493 = weight(_text_:d in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072819493 = score(doc=2381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
0.012452577 = weight(_text_:h in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012452577 = score(doc=2381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
