Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Daniel, H.-D."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.-D.: What is behind the curtain of the Leiden Ranking? (2015) 0.00
    0.004858693 = product of:
      0.009717386 = sum of:
        0.009717386 = product of:
          0.014576078 = sum of:
            0.010980166 = weight(_text_:d in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010980166 = score(doc=2171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
            0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0035959128 = score(doc=2171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.9, S.1950-1953
  2. Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011) 0.00
    0.004048911 = product of:
      0.008097822 = sum of:
        0.008097822 = product of:
          0.012146732 = sum of:
            0.009150138 = weight(_text_:d in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009150138 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
            0.0029965942 = weight(_text_:s in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029965942 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.61-71
  3. Mutz, R.; Wolbring, T.; Daniel, H.-D.: ¬The effect of the "very important paper" (VIP) designation in Angewandte Chemie International Edition on citation impact : a propensity score matching analysis (2017) 0.00
    0.004048911 = product of:
      0.008097822 = sum of:
        0.008097822 = product of:
          0.012146732 = sum of:
            0.009150138 = weight(_text_:d in 3792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009150138 = score(doc=3792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 3792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3792)
            0.0029965942 = weight(_text_:s in 3792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029965942 = score(doc=3792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3792)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.9, S.2139-2153