Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Daniel, H.-D."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: What do we know about the h index? (2007) 0.02 
    0.021344937 = product of:
  0.10672469 = sum of:
    0.10672469 = sum of:
      0.056026854 = weight(_text_:h in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056026854 = score(doc=477,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.54347324 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
      0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050697833 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Jorge Hirsch recently proposed the h index to quantify the research output of individual scientists. The new index has attracted a lot of attention in the scientific community. The claim that the h index in a single number provides a good representation of the scientific lifetime achievement of a scientist as well as the (supposed) simple calculation of the h index using common literature databases lead to the danger of improper use of the index. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of the h index and summarize the studies on the convergent validity of this index. We also introduce corrections and complements as well as single-number alternatives to the h index.
    Object
    H-Index
  2. Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011) 0.01 
    0.011244466 = product of:
  0.056222327 = sum of:
    0.056222327 = sum of:
      0.02000959 = weight(_text_:h in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02000959 = score(doc=4132,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
      0.036212735 = weight(_text_:l in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036212735 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  3. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007) 0.01 
    0.010072331 = product of:
  0.050361652 = sum of:
    0.050361652 = sum of:
      0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014148918 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
      0.036212735 = weight(_text_:l in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036212735 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  4. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Universality of citation distributions : a validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry (2009) 0.01 
    0.010072331 = product of:
  0.050361652 = sum of:
    0.050361652 = sum of:
      0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014148918 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
      0.036212735 = weight(_text_:l in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036212735 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  5. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008) 0.01 
    0.008057865 = product of:
  0.040289324 = sum of:
    0.040289324 = sum of:
      0.011319133 = weight(_text_:h in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011319133 = score(doc=2381,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
      0.02897019 = weight(_text_:l in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02897019 = score(doc=2381,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.17565648 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  6. Neuhaus, C.; Daniel, H.-D.: Data sources for performing citation analysis : an overview (2008) 0.00 
    0.0019808484 = product of:
  0.009904242 = sum of:
    0.009904242 = product of:
      0.019808484 = sum of:
        0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 1735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019808484 = score(doc=1735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1735)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  7. Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.-D.: What is behind the curtain of the Leiden Ranking? (2015) 0.00 
    0.00169787 = product of:
  0.00848935 = sum of:
    0.00848935 = product of:
      0.0169787 = sum of:
        0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0169787 = score(doc=2171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  8. Mutz, R.; Wolbring, T.; Daniel, H.-D.: ¬The effect of the "very important paper" (VIP) designation in Angewandte Chemie International Edition on citation impact : a propensity score matching analysis (2017) 0.00 
    0.0014148918 = product of:
  0.007074459 = sum of:
    0.007074459 = product of:
      0.014148918 = sum of:
        0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 3792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014148918 = score(doc=3792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 3792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Authors

Years