Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Davenport, E."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.03 
    0.02921453 = product of:
  0.05842906 = sum of:
    0.02427594 = weight(_text_:information in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02427594 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
    0.03415312 = product of:
      0.06830624 = sum of:
        0.06830624 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06830624 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
    Source
    Journal of education for library and information science. 41(2000) no.?, S.294-306
    Theme
    Information
  2. Davenport, E.; Hall, H.: Organizational Knowledge and Communities of Practice (2002) 0.02 
    0.023545908 = product of:
  0.047091816 = sum of:
    0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 4293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01029941 = score(doc=4293,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4293, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4293)
    0.036792405 = product of:
      0.07358481 = sum of:
        0.07358481 = weight(_text_:organization in 4293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07358481 = score(doc=4293,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 4293, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4293)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    A community of practice has recently been defined as "a flexible group of professionals, informally bound by common interests, who interact through interdependent tasks guided by a common purpose thereby embodying a store of common knowledge" (Jubert, 1999, p. 166). The association of communities of practice with the production of collective knowledge has long been recognized, and they have been objects of study for a number of decades in the context of professional communication, particularly communication in science (Abbott, 1988; Bazerman & Paradis, 1991). Recently, however, they have been invoked in the domain of organization studies as sites where people learn and share insights. If, as Stinchcombe suggests, an organization is "a set of stable social relations, dehberately created, with the explicit intention of continuously accomplishing some specific goals or purposes" (Stinchcombe, 1965, p. 142), where does this "flexible" and "embodied" source of knowledge fit? Can communities of practice be harnessed, engineered, and managed like other organizational groups, or does their strength lie in the fact that they operate outside the stable and persistent social relations that characterize the organization?
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.171-228
  3. Davenport, E.; Rosenbaum, H.: ¬A system for organizing situational knowledge in the workplace that is based on the shape of documents (2000) 0.01 
    0.010840065 = product of:
  0.04336026 = sum of:
    0.04336026 = product of:
      0.08672052 = sum of:
        0.08672052 = weight(_text_:organization in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08672052 = score(doc=103,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.48245144 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The authors propose a system for organizing situational knowledge, or knowledge of appropriate conduct, in workplaces that rely on web-based interaction. The conceptual framework that underlies the system is based on five propositions. First, recurrent and routine practice in organizations is articulated in, and co-evolves with distinct documentary forms, or genres. Second, the presence of sets of documentary genres in a group or other form of organization is indicative of activities that characterize such organization. Third, such indexicality may be observed at different levels of organization (the project, the unit, the firm), and clusters of genres at different levels of aggregation may provide profiles of activities at those different levels. Fourth, a notation (such as XML) which captures the 'shape' of documents may be used to model flexible documentary 'compounds' that capture situational knowledge, or knowledge of appropriate activity in an organization. Fifth, such encodings may be used compare organizations and sort them on the basis of their genre and activity profiles; visualization may accelerate the sorting process. An activity classifying system that integrates these proposals might improve organizational experience in a number of evaluative contexts (like benchmarking, team formation, or merger)
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.7
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  4. Davenport, E.; Higgins, M.; Somerville, I.: Narratives of new media in Scottish households : the evolution of a framework of inquiry (2000) 0.00 
    0.0036413912 = product of:
  0.014565565 = sum of:
    0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014565565 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The authors describe a study of the social dynamics of new media in Scottish households. The evolving project drew on dialogues with multiple household members elicited in group conversations. This approach to interviews captured different and conflicting points of view, a feature shared with certain social approaches to systems design. Analysis of the interview transcripts revealed that there are recurrent narratives and behavioral genres across households (and across sample groups), and that these reflect tactics, stratagems, and plans by means of which respondents navigate social space. The authors' approach contrasts with prevailing "needs and uses" models in information science, in offering a methodological framework based on group narrative and genre analysis that contributes to a theory of social informatics in the household
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.10, S.900-912
  5. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Who dunnit? : Metatags and hyperauthorship (2001) 0.00 
    0.0030039945 = product of:
  0.012015978 = sum of:
    0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012015978 = score(doc=6031,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.9, S.770-773
  6. Davenport, E.: Mundane knowledge management and microlevel organizational learning : an ethological approach (2002) 0.00 
    0.0030039945 = product of:
  0.012015978 = sum of:
    0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012015978 = score(doc=981,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 981, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=981)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.12, S.1038-1046
  7. Davenport, E.: Social informatics and sociotechnical research : a view from the UK (2009) 0.00 
    0.0030039945 = product of:
  0.012015978 = sum of:
    0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 3658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012015978 = score(doc=3658,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3658, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3658)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information science in transition, Ed.: A. Gilchrist
  8. Davenport, E.: Implicit orders : documentary genres and organizational practice (2001) 0.00 
    0.0021457102 = product of:
  0.008582841 = sum of:
    0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 1592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008582841 = score(doc=1592,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1592, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1592)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today

Authors

Themes