Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.01761894 = product of:
  0.03523788 = sum of:
    0.03523788 = product of:
      0.07047576 = sum of:
        0.07047576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07047576 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

31. 7.2001 20:22:57

0.012668633 = product of:
  0.025337266 = sum of:
    0.025337266 = product of:
      0.10134906 = sum of:
        0.10134906 = weight(_text_:authors in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10134906 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The authors describe a study of the social dynamics of new media in Scottish households. The evolving project drew on dialogues with multiple household members elicited in group conversations. This approach to interviews captured different and conflicting points of view, a feature shared with certain social approaches to systems design. Analysis of the interview transcripts revealed that there are recurrent narratives and behavioral genres across households (and across sample groups), and that these reflect tactics, stratagems, and plans by means of which respondents navigate social space. The authors' approach contrasts with prevailing "needs and uses" models in information science, in offering a methodological framework based on group narrative and genre analysis that contributes to a theory of social informatics in the household

0.010451089 = product of:
  0.020902177 = sum of:
    0.020902177 = product of:
      0.08360871 = sum of:
        0.08360871 = weight(_text_:authors in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08360871 = score(doc=6031,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Multiple authorship is a topic of growing concern in a number of scientific domains. When, as is increasingly common, scholarly articles and clinical reports have scores or even hundreds of authors-what Cronin (in press) has termed "hyperauthorship" -the precise nature of each individual's contribution is often masked. A notation that describes collaborators' contributions and allows those contributions to be tracked in, and across, texts (and over time) offers a solution. Such a notation should be useful, easy to use, and acceptable to communities of scientists. Drawing on earlier work, we present a proposal for an XML-like "contribution" mark-up, and discuss the potential benefits and possible drawbacks

0.008958076 = product of:
  0.017916152 = sum of:
    0.017916152 = product of:
      0.07166461 = sum of:
        0.07166461 = weight(_text_:authors in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07166461 = score(doc=1825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions

0.0074650636 = product of:
  0.014930127 = sum of:
    0.014930127 = product of:
      0.05972051 = sum of:
        0.05972051 = weight(_text_:authors in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05972051 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The authors propose a system for organizing situational knowledge, or knowledge of appropriate conduct, in workplaces that rely on web-based interaction. The conceptual framework that underlies the system is based on five propositions. First, recurrent and routine practice in organizations is articulated in, and co-evolves with distinct documentary forms, or genres. Second, the presence of sets of documentary genres in a group or other form of organization is indicative of activities that characterize such organization. Third, such indexicality may be observed at different levels of organization (the project, the unit, the firm), and clusters of genres at different levels of aggregation may provide profiles of activities at those different levels. Fourth, a notation (such as XML) which captures the 'shape' of documents may be used to model flexible documentary 'compounds' that capture situational knowledge, or knowledge of appropriate activity in an organization. Fifth, such encodings may be used compare organizations and sort them on the basis of their genre and activity profiles; visualization may accelerate the sorting process. An activity classifying system that integrates these proposals might improve organizational experience in a number of evaluative contexts (like benchmarking, team formation, or merger)