Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- author's%3a%22Kambil%2c A.%22 2
- authors%3a%22Kambil%2c A.%22 2
-
Sun, Q.; Shaw, D.; Davis, C.H.: ¬A model for estimating the occurence of same-frequency words and the boundary between high- and low-frequency words in texts (1999)
0.00
0.0029000505 = product of: 0.005800101 = sum of: 0.005800101 = product of: 0.011600202 = sum of: 0.011600202 = weight(_text_:a in 3063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.011600202 = score(doc=3063,freq=12.0), product of: 0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.046056706 = queryNorm 0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 3063, product of: 3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of: 12.0 = termFreq=12.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3063) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A simpler model is proposed for estimating the frequency of any same-frequency words and identifying the boundary point between high-frequency words and low-frequency words in a text. The model, based on a 'maximum-ranking method', assigns ranks to the words and estimates word frequency by a formula. The boundary value between high-frequency and low-frequency words is obtained by taking the square root of the number of different words in the text. This straightforward model was used successfully with both English and Chinese texts
- Type
- a
-
Davis, C.H.; Shaw, D.: Comparison of retrieval system interfaces using an objective measure of screen design effectiveness (1989)
0.00
0.0020506454 = product of: 0.004101291 = sum of: 0.004101291 = product of: 0.008202582 = sum of: 0.008202582 = weight(_text_:a in 3325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.008202582 = score(doc=3325,freq=6.0), product of: 0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.046056706 = queryNorm 0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 3325, product of: 2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of: 6.0 = termFreq=6.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3325) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Many evaluations of screen design for computer system interfaces are subjective. At best, they consist of sophisticated measures of user behaviour based on instruments devised by cognitive scientists: at worst, they represent only the preconceived notions of software designers. 2 straightforward experiments are described that use tallies of keyboarding errors as a measure of interface effectiveness. By programming the computer to keep such tallies during the input of search logic for a retrieval system, it is possible to obtain objectives and empirically based data for comparing the effectiveness of different interface designs
- Type
- a