Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.007038284 = product of:
  0.049267985 = sum of:
    0.043041058 = weight(_text_:web in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043041058 = score(doc=5768,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09947448 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
    0.006226926 = weight(_text_:information in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006226926 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

A citation analysis of undergraduate term papers in microeconomics revealed a significant decrease in the frequency of scholarly resources cited between 1996 and 1999. Book citations decreased from 30% to 19%, newspaper citations increased from 7% to 19%, and Web citations increased from 9% to 21%. Web citations checked in 2000 revealed that only 18% of URLs cited in 1996 led to the correct Internet document. For 1999 bibliographies, only 55% of URLs led to the correct document. The authors recommend (1) setting stricter guidelines for acceptable citations in course assignments; (2) creating and maintaining scholarly portals for authoritative Web sites with a commitment to long-term access; and (3) continuing to instruct students how to critically evaluate resources

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.4, S.309-314

0.005605833 = product of:
  0.03924083 = sum of:
    0.030434625 = weight(_text_:web in 2208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030434625 = score(doc=2208,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09947448 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2208, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2208)
    0.0088062035 = weight(_text_:information in 2208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0088062035 = score(doc=2208,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2208, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2208)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

This study reports an analysis of referral URL data by the Cornell University IP address from the American Chemical Society servers. The goal of this work is to better understand the tools used and pathways taken when scientists connect to electronic journals. While various methods of referral were identified in this study, most individuals were referred infrequently and followed few and consistent pathways each time they connected. The relationship between the number and types of referrals followed an inverse-square law. Whereas the majority of referrals came from established finding tools (library catalog, library e-journal list, and bibliographic databases), a substantial number of referrals originated from generic Web searches. Scientists are also relying an local alternatives or substitutes such as departmental or personal Web pages with lists of linked publications. The use of electronic mail as a method to refer scientists directly to online articles may be greatly underestimated. Implications for the development of redundant library services such as e-journal lists and the practice of publishers to allow linking from other resources are discussed.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.4, S.326-332

8.386861E-4 = product of:
  0.011741605 = sum of:
    0.011741605 = weight(_text_:information in 2377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011741605 = score(doc=2377,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2377, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2377)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Eigenfactor.org, a journal evaluation tool that uses an iterative algorithm to weight citations (similar to the PageRank algorithm used for Google), has been proposed as a more valid method for calculating the impact of journals. The purpose of this brief communication is to investigate whether the principle of repeated improvement provides different rankings of journals than does a simple unweighted citation count (the method used by the Institute for Scientific Information@ [ISI]).

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.13, S.2186-2188

5.189105E-4 = product of:
  0.0072647473 = sum of:
    0.0072647473 = weight(_text_:information in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0072647473 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.1, S.3-8

4.4478045E-4 = product of:
  0.006226926 = sum of:
    0.006226926 = weight(_text_:information in 1823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006226926 = score(doc=1823,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1823, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1823)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.11, S.1062-1068

4.4478045E-4 = product of:
  0.006226926 = sum of:
    0.006226926 = weight(_text_:information in 199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006226926 = score(doc=199,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053508412 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030480823 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 199, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=199)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1243-1248