Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.009127182 = product of:
  0.036508728 = sum of:
    0.036508728 = product of:
      0.073017456 = sum of:
        0.073017456 = weight(_text_:22 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073017456 = score(doc=1423,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19063982 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054440062 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 2.2008 13:28:00

Source

Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 55(2008) H.1, S.18-22

0.007375877 = product of:
  0.029503508 = sum of:
    0.029503508 = product of:
      0.059007015 = sum of:
        0.059007015 = weight(_text_:22 in 1765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059007015 = score(doc=1765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19063982 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054440062 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1765)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 3.2008 13:37:50

0.005560779 = product of:
  0.022243116 = sum of:
    0.022243116 = weight(_text_:information in 2585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022243116 = score(doc=2585,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09556833 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.054440062 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2585, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2585)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Purpose - The aim of this paper is to ask why the libraries and the computer and media centres of German universities are picking up too little to improve the conditions for learning, teaching and research. Design/methodology/approach - With the founding of the Information, Communication and Media Center/Informations-, Kommunikations- und Medienzentrums (ICMC/IKMZ), the central services of the Brandenburg Technical University of Cottbus (BTU Cottbus) library, computer center, multimedia center and administrative data processing were combined on a common management level, and the prerequisites for the development of integrated information management were created. Findings - On this basis the following goal was set: the realization of more efficient organizational structures for a broad spectrum of customer- and service-oriented information, communications and media (ICM) offers for research, teaching and administration. Originality/value - The paper gives an overview of German discussion on the convergence of services, and presents the ICMC/IKMZ of Cottbus University as an example of a converged institution.

0.0036879384 = product of:
  0.014751754 = sum of:
    0.014751754 = product of:
      0.029503508 = sum of:
        0.029503508 = weight(_text_:22 in 3121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029503508 = score(doc=3121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19063982 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054440062 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3121)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 1.2005 18:16:37

0.0027803895 = product of:
  0.011121558 = sum of:
    0.011121558 = weight(_text_:information in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011121558 = score(doc=2980,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09556833 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.054440062 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In Desktop und Internet werden weiterhin große Chancen einer kostengünstigen und nachhaltigen Optimierung der elektronischen Fachinformation gesehen. Gründe dafür sind die vergleichsweise einfach handzuhabenden Produktionswerkzeuge, die rasche Distribution über das Internet und der grundsätzlich orts- und zeitunabhängige Ressourcenzugang für jedermann. Die Vision einer allumfassenden Ressourcenverfügbarkeit im Sinne der Informationsfreiheit scheint die neue Technologie in greifbare Nähe gerückt zu haben. Dieser aus rein technischer Sicht bestehenden Möglichkeit stellen sich zwei Faktoren entgegen, die das wissenschaftliche Publizieren seit langem bestimmen; dies sind Maßnahmen zur Qualitätssicherung, zu denen insbesondere das PeerReviewing gehört, sowie urheber- und verbreitungsrechtliche Schutzmaßnahmen, die die Lizenzierungspraxis für den Zugriff auf elektronische Informationsressourcen begründen. Insofern steht die auf den technischen Möglichkeiten beruhende Option einer ungehinderten Ressourcenzugänglichkeit den Einschränkungen des urheber- und verbreitungsrechtlichen Schutzes (einschließlich der Kostendeckung für die Herstellung qualitätsgesicherter Information) gegenüber. Welche Beeinträchtigungen sich daraus für die Nutzung kostenpflichtig lizenzierter Fachinformation ergeben können, wird an der aktuellen Debatte um die Urheberrechtsnovellierung in besonderer Weise deutlich.