Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Diedrichs, R."
  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Diedrichs, R.; Cramer, C.: F.A.Z.-Rezensionen als Kataloganreicherung im Katalog des GBV : ein Best-Practice-Beispiel (2013) 0.05
    0.054917037 = product of:
      0.17161575 = sum of:
        0.012064188 = weight(_text_:und in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012064188 = score(doc=899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.061583076 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
        0.04041926 = weight(_text_:aus in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04041926 = score(doc=899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.094787054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4113739 = idf(docFreq=3965, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.42642173 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4113739 = idf(docFreq=3965, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
        0.037747014 = weight(_text_:dem in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037747014 = score(doc=899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09160014 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2966774 = idf(docFreq=4447, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.41208467 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2966774 = idf(docFreq=4447, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
        0.017330272 = weight(_text_:der in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017330272 = score(doc=899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06206654 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
        0.012064188 = weight(_text_:und in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012064188 = score(doc=899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.061583076 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
        0.017330272 = weight(_text_:der in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017330272 = score(doc=899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06206654 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
        0.017330272 = weight(_text_:der in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017330272 = score(doc=899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06206654 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
        0.017330272 = weight(_text_:der in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017330272 = score(doc=899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06206654 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
      0.32 = coord(8/25)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag beschreibt das automatisierte Verfahren zum Einsatz von Buchrezensionen der FAZ zur Kataloganreicherung im GBV. Mit diesem Verfahren werden regelmäßig Buchrezensionen aus dem Datenbanksystem des FAZ-Archivs gezogen und den entsprechenden Einträgen im GVK zugeordnet. In dem Projekt ist es erstmals gelungen, bibliografische Angaben aus retrodigitalisierten Zeitungsinhalten zu extrahieren. Bisher wurden so die Jahrgänge 1949 bis 1974 mit ca. 20.000 Rezensionen bearbeitet.
  2. Hauer, M.; Diedrichs, R.: Kataloganreicherung in Europa : Bibliotheken als Information-Retrieval-Systeme in einer digitalen Welt (2010) 0.03
    0.03121991 = product of:
      0.13008296 = sum of:
        0.023939129 = weight(_text_:und in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023939129 = score(doc=3571,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.061583076 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.38872904 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
        0.020551175 = weight(_text_:der in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020551175 = score(doc=3571,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06206654 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
        0.023939129 = weight(_text_:und in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023939129 = score(doc=3571,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.061583076 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.38872904 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
        0.020551175 = weight(_text_:der in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020551175 = score(doc=3571,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06206654 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
        0.020551175 = weight(_text_:der in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020551175 = score(doc=3571,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06206654 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
        0.020551175 = weight(_text_:der in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020551175 = score(doc=3571,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06206654 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027785596 = queryNorm
            0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
      0.24 = coord(6/25)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliotheken sind nicht chaotische Sammlungen von Medien, sondern werden stets als Information-Retrieval-Systeme implementiert, denn das Wiederfinden bei exakten und vor allem bei vagen Anfragen ist von Anfang an das Sammlungsziel. Niemand kennt zum Zeitpunkt der Sammlung die Fragestellung, die einen zukünftigen Benutzer zu diesem Medium führen wird. Die Art der Sammlungsorganisation bestimmt in hohem Maße die zukünftig mögliche Antwortmenge und deren informatorische Qualität. Der Siegeszug der digitalen Information-Retrieval-Systeme im Internet hat in den letzten zehn Jahren Erwartungen und Märkte geschaffen, die weder Karteikarten, noch deren digitales Ebenbild, die heutigen Bibliotheksmanagement-Systeme befriedigen können. Es genügt nicht mehr, dass Google und andere kostenlos das aufsammeln und nachweisen, was im Internet frei zugänglich ist. Alte, noch »marktfähige« Inhalte werden neu aufbereitet, mit neuen Inhalten kombiniert, um neue Geschäftsfelder zu schaffen. Es geht um Verdrängung und Neuverteilung, und die älteren Inhalte der Bibliotheken sind meist noch hinreichend »marktfähig«.

Authors