Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dietze, J."
  • × language_ss:"d"
  1. Dietze, J.: Zum Problem der Textkompression : Der Informationskern eines wissenschaftlichen Textes und die Kernsätze der generativen Transformationsgrammatik (1987) 0.03
    0.032148283 = product of:
      0.0803707 = sum of:
        0.027223425 = weight(_text_:information in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027223425 = score(doc=921,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
        0.05314728 = weight(_text_:und in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05314728 = score(doc=921,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Imprint
    Ilmenau : Institut für Informationswissenschaft, Erfindungswesen und Recht der Technischen Hochschule Ilmenau
    Source
    Wissensvermittlung - Informatik - Spitzenleistungen. 15. Koll. über Information und Dokumentation vom 2.-6.11.1987. In: Dokumentation, Information H.70
  2. Dietze, J.: Informationsrecherchesprache und deren Lexik : Bemerkungen zur Terminologiediskussion (1980) 0.02
    0.015567391 = product of:
      0.038918477 = sum of:
        0.023576178 = weight(_text_:information in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023576178 = score(doc=32,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
        0.015342298 = weight(_text_:und in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015342298 = score(doc=32,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information research consists of the comparison of 2 sources of information - that of formal description and content analysis and that based on the needs of the user. Information research filters identical elements from the sources by means of document and research cross-sections. Establishing such cross-sections for scientific documents and research questions is made possible by classification. Through the definition of the terms 'class' and 'classification' it becomes clear that the terms 'hierarchic classification' and 'classification' cannot be used synonymously. The basic types of information research languages are both hierarchic and non-hierarchic arising from the structure of lexicology and the paradigmatic relations of the lexicological units. The names for the lexicological units ('descriptor' and 'subject haedings') are synonymous, but it is necessary to differentiate between the terms 'descriptor language' and 'information research thesaurus'. The principles of precoordination and post-coordination as applied to word formation are unsuitable for the typification of information research languages
  3. Dietze, J.: Lexikalische Makrostruktur und semantischer Abstand, lexikalische Mikrostruktur und semantische Konsistenz : Versuch ihrer computergestützten Bestimmung (1990) 0.01
    0.012401032 = product of:
      0.06200516 = sum of:
        0.06200516 = weight(_text_:und in 6131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06200516 = score(doc=6131,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.5937934 = fieldWeight in 6131, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6131)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg: Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe. 39(1990) H.2, S.43-48
  4. Dietze, J.: Möglichkeiten der Schlüsselung am Beispiel des neuen Systematischen Kataloges der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt in Halle/ S (1969) 0.01
    0.008678915 = product of:
      0.043394573 = sum of:
        0.043394573 = weight(_text_:und in 4373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043394573 = score(doc=4373,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 4373, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4373)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Über Bücher, Bibliotheken und Leser: gesammelte Beiträge zum 60. Geburtstag von Horst Kunze
  5. Dietze, J.: Thesauruslexik zur Wissensrepräsentation (1989) 0.01
    0.008182559 = product of:
      0.040912796 = sum of:
        0.040912796 = weight(_text_:und in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040912796 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg: Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe. 38(1989) H.4, S.99-103
  6. Dietze, J.: Sachkatalogisierung in einem OPAC (1993) 0.01
    0.008004832 = product of:
      0.04002416 = sum of:
        0.04002416 = weight(_text_:und in 7388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04002416 = score(doc=7388,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 7388, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7388)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Katalogisierung über den Rechner bedeutet immer auch, einen OPAC aufzubauen, der es erlaubt, nach unterschiedlichen Merkmalen - formal und sachlich - und mit deren Kombination zu recherchieren. Die Freiwortrecherche wird von den Benutzern gern verwendet, obwohl dabei die Recall Ration (Vollständigkeit) nicht ausgeschöpft wird. Die Nutzung von Schlagwörtern sollte deren Standardisierung in einer Normdatei voraussetzen, um den Subjektivismus der Katalogisierer auszuschalten. Schlagwortketten sind prinzipiell für einen OPAC überflüssig. Bei Verwendung einer hierarchischen, d.h. systematischen Klassifikation sollte deren Notation systemkohärent, flexibel und synthetisch (Facetten bzw. Schlüssel) sein. Mit Hilfe von Registern sind Schlagwörter und Systemnotationen vice versa zu verknüpfen. Wenn Sachkatalogisierung im Verbund erfolgt, bilden Terminologiekontrolle und Einheitsklassifikation als Grobsysteme wichtige Desiderate
  7. Dietze, J.: ¬Die semantische Struktur der Thesauruslexik (1988) 0.01
    0.0071597393 = product of:
      0.035798695 = sum of:
        0.035798695 = weight(_text_:und in 6051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035798695 = score(doc=6051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 6051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6051)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg: Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe. 37(1988) H.6, S.120-123
  8. Dietze, J.: ¬Die Richtlinien für die Bearbeitung des Schlagwortkataloges der Thüringischen Landesbibliothek Weimar (1961) 0.01
    0.0071597393 = product of:
      0.035798695 = sum of:
        0.035798695 = weight(_text_:und in 7195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035798695 = score(doc=7195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 7195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7195)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx-Universität Leipzig: Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe. 10(1961), S.669-673
  9. Dietze, J.: Sachkatalogisierung in einem OPAC (1994) 0.01
    0.0071597393 = product of:
      0.035798695 = sum of:
        0.035798695 = weight(_text_:und in 7387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035798695 = score(doc=7387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 7387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7387)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 41(1994) H.3, S.297-303
  10. Dietze, J.: Texterschließung : lexikalische Semantik und Wissensrepräsentation (1994) 0.01
    0.0071597393 = product of:
      0.035798695 = sum of:
        0.035798695 = weight(_text_:und in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035798695 = score(doc=2822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  11. Dietze, J.; Völkel, H.: Verifikation einer Methode der lexikalischen Semantik : zur computergestützten Bestimmung der semantischen Konsistenz und des semantischen Abstands (1992) 0.00
    0.0040912796 = product of:
      0.020456398 = sum of:
        0.020456398 = weight(_text_:und in 6680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020456398 = score(doc=6680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 6680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6680)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)