Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ding, Y."
  • × author_ss:"He, B."
  1. He, B.; Ding, Y.; Ni, C.: Mining enriched contextual information of scientific collaboration : a meso perspective (2011) 0.05
    0.04718731 = sum of:
      0.030007599 = product of:
        0.120030396 = sum of:
          0.120030396 = weight(_text_:authors in 4444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.120030396 = score(doc=4444,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.23830564 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052273605 = queryNorm
              0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 4444, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4444)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01717971 = product of:
        0.03435942 = sum of:
          0.03435942 = weight(_text_:c in 4444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03435942 = score(doc=4444,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052273605 = queryNorm
              0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4444, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4444)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Studying scientific collaboration using coauthorship networks has attracted much attention in recent years. How and in what context two authors collaborate remain among the major questions. Previous studies, however, have focused on either exploring the global topology of coauthorship networks (macro perspective) or ranking the impact of individual authors (micro perspective). Neither of them has provided information on the context of the collaboration between two specific authors, which may potentially imply rich socioeconomic, disciplinary, and institutional information on collaboration. Different from the macro perspective and micro perspective, this article proposes a novel method (meso perspective) to analyze scientific collaboration, in which a contextual subgraph is extracted as the unit of analysis. A contextual subgraph is defined as a small subgraph of a large-scale coauthorship network that captures relationship and context between two coauthors. This method is applied to the field of library and information science. Topological properties of all the subgraphs in four time spans are investigated, including size, average degree, clustering coefficient, and network centralization. Results show that contextual subgprahs capture useful contextual information on two authors' collaboration.
  2. Li, D.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.; He, B.; Tang, J.; Yan, E.; Lin, N.; Qin, Z.; Dong, T.: Modeling topic and community structure in social tagging : the TTR-LDA-Community model (2011) 0.01
    0.008589855 = product of:
      0.01717971 = sum of:
        0.01717971 = product of:
          0.03435942 = sum of:
            0.03435942 = weight(_text_:c in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03435942 = score(doc=4759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052273605 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Lin, N.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; He, B.; Qin, Z.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Dong, T.: ¬The dynamic features of Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube (2012) 0.01
    0.008589855 = product of:
      0.01717971 = sum of:
        0.01717971 = product of:
          0.03435942 = sum of:
            0.03435942 = weight(_text_:c in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03435942 = score(doc=4970,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052273605 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article investigates the dynamic features of social tagging vocabularies in Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube from 2003 to 2008. Three algorithms are designed to study the macro- and micro-tag growth as well as the dynamics of taggers' activities, respectively. Moreover, we propose a Tagger Tag Resource Latent Dirichlet Allocation (TTR-LDA) model to explore the evolution of topics emerging from those social vocabularies. Our results show that (a) at the macro level, tag growth in all the three tagging systems obeys power law distribution with exponents lower than 1; at the micro level, the tag growth of popular resources in all three tagging systems follows a similar power law distribution; (b) the exponents of tag growth vary in different evolving stages of resources; (c) the growth of number of taggers associated with different popular resources presents a feature of convergence over time; (d) the active level of taggers has a positive correlation with the macro-tag growth of different tagging systems; and (e) some topics evolve into several subtopics over time while others experience relatively stable stages in which their contents do not change much, and certain groups of taggers continue their interests in them.

Authors