Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ding, Y."
  • × author_ss:"Sugimoto, C.R."
  1. Yan, E.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.R.: P-Rank: an indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks (2011) 0.07 
    0.066807866 = sum of:
  0.025935514 = product of:
    0.103742056 = sum of:
      0.103742056 = weight(_text_:authors in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.103742056 = score(doc=4349,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24273461 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053245123 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.04087235 = product of:
    0.0817447 = sum of:
      0.0817447 = weight(_text_:y in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0817447 = score(doc=4349,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053245123 = queryNorm
          0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Ranking scientific productivity and prestige are often limited to homogeneous networks. These networks are unable to account for the multiple factors that constitute the scholarly communication and reward system. This study proposes a new informetric indicator, P-Rank, for measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks containing articles, authors, and journals. P-Rank differentiates the weight of each citation based on its citing papers, citing journals, and citing authors. Articles from 16 representative library and information science journals are selected as the dataset. Principle Component Analysis is conducted to examine the relationship between P-Rank and other bibliometric indicators. We also compare the correlation and rank variances between citation counts and P-Rank scores. This work provides a new approach to examining prestige in scholarly communication networks in a more comprehensive and nuanced way.
  2. Sugimoto, C.R.; Li, D.; Russell, T.G.; Finlay, S.C.; Ding, Y.: ¬The shifting sands of disciplinary development : analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation (2011) 0.05 
    0.04934294 = sum of:
  0.015282649 = product of:
    0.061130594 = sum of:
      0.061130594 = weight(_text_:authors in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061130594 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24273461 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053245123 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.034060292 = product of:
    0.068120584 = sum of:
      0.068120584 = weight(_text_:y in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.068120584 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053245123 = queryNorm
          0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This work identifies changes in dominant topics in library and information science (LIS) over time, by analyzing the 3,121 doctoral dissertations completed between 1930 and 2009 at North American Library and Information Science programs. The authors utilize latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) to identify latent topics diachronically and to identify representative dissertations of those topics. The findings indicate that the main topics in LIS have changed substantially from those in the initial period (1930-1969) to the present (2000-2009). However, some themes occurred in multiple periods, representing core areas of the field: library history occurred in the first two periods; citation analysis in the second and third periods; and information-seeking behavior in the fourth and last period. Two topics occurred in three of the five periods: information retrieval and information use. One of the notable changes in the topics was the diminishing use of the word library (and related terms). This has implications for the provision of doctoral education in LIS. This work is compared to other earlier analyses and provides validation for the use of LDA in topic analysis of a discipline.
  3. Milojevic, S.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: ¬The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science : analysis of article title words (2011) 0.02 
    0.017030146 = product of:
  0.034060292 = sum of:
    0.034060292 = product of:
      0.068120584 = sum of:
        0.068120584 = weight(_text_:y in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068120584 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053245123 = queryNorm
            0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Themes